Reino: Encapsulation

La encapsulación consiste en crear límites fuertes. En un explorador web esto puede suponer la seguridad de que tu codificación móvil no se vea comprometido por otro código móvil. En el servidor puede significar la diferenciación entre los datos validados y los que no lo están, entre los datos de un usuario y los de otro, o entre los diferentes usuarios, los datos que pueden ver y los que no.

104 elementos encontrados
Debilidades
Abstract
La plantilla define una instancia de RDS de Amazon sin cifrado.
Explanation
De forma predeterminada, las instancias de RDS de Amazon no están cifradas. Esto expone los datos a posible robo y acceso no autorizados.


"Resources": {
"RDSDBExample": {
"Type": "AWS::RDS::DBInstance",
"Properties": {
"StorageEncrypted": false,
"DBName": "Test DB",
"DBInstanceClass": "db.m4.large"
}
}
}
References
[1] Amazon Web Services Encrypting Amazon RDS resources
[2] Amazon Web Services Security in Amazon RDS
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[10] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[11] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[12] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_rds_storage.base
Abstract
La plantilla define una instancia de RDS de Amazon sin cifrado.
Explanation
De forma predeterminada, las instancias de RDS de Amazon no están cifradas. Esto expone los datos a posible robo y acceso no autorizados.
References
[1] Ansible project contributors community.aws.rds_instance – Manage RDS instances
[2] Amazon Web Services Encrypting Amazon RDS resources
[3] Amazon Web Services Security in Amazon RDS
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[9] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[10] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[11] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[12] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[13] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[15] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_rds_storage.base
Abstract
La plantilla define un clúster de Amazon Redshift sin cifrado.
Explanation
De forma predeterminada, los clústeres de Amazon Redshift no están cifrados. Esto expone los datos al acceso no autorizado y posible robo.

Ejemplo 1: La siguiente plantilla define un clúster de Redshift sin cifrado habilitado.

"Resources": {
"RedshiftClusterTest": {
"Type": "AWS::Redshift::Cluster",
"Properties": {
"DBName": "mydb",
"MasterUsername": "master",
"MasterUserPassword": "masterPass",
"NodeType": "ds2.xlarge",
"ClusterType": "single-node",
}
}
References
[1] Amazon Web Services Amazon Redshift database encryption
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_redshift_storage.base
Abstract
La plantilla define un clúster de Amazon Redshift sin cifrado.
Explanation
De forma predeterminada, los clústeres de Amazon Redshift no están cifrados. Esto expone los datos al acceso no autorizado y posible robo.
References
[1] Ansible project contributors community.aws.redshift – create, delete, or modify an Amazon Redshift instance
[2] Amazon Web Services Amazon Redshift database encryption
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[10] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[11] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[12] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_ansible_misconfiguration_insecure_redshift_storage.base
Abstract
El contenedor de Amazon S3 se crea sin habilitar el cifrado en reposo de forma predeterminada.
Explanation
Se crea un contenedor de Amazon S3 sin cifrado del lado del servidor. El cifrado mitiga las vulneraciones de datos al hacer que los datos sean ilegibles para cualquier persona sin las credenciales adecuadas. Como tal, el cifrado en reposo es una medida para cumplir con algunos requisitos de cumplimiento industriales y gubernamentales, como RGPD, HIPAA y PCI.
References
[1] GDPR Article 32 European Parliament and Council of the European Union
[2] HIPAA Security Rule U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
[3] Amazon Simple Storage Service User Guide Amazon Web Services, Inc.
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[10] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001350, CCI-002475
[11] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[12] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.2 - Use of Cryptography
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13), Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_s3_bucket_storage.base
Abstract
Se crea un contenedor de Amazon S3 sin habilitar el cifrado en reposo.
Explanation
Se crea un contenedor de Amazon S3 sin cifrado del lado del servidor. El cifrado mitiga las vulneraciones de datos al hacer que los datos sean ilegibles para cualquier persona sin las credenciales adecuadas. El cifrado en reposo puede ayudar a satisfacer algunos requisitos de cumplimiento industriales y gubernamentales, como RGPD, HIPAA y PCI.
References
[1] GDPR Article 32 European Parliament and Council of the European Union
[2] Manage S3 buckets in AWS Ansible project contributors
[3] Amazon Simple Storage Service User Guide Amazon Web Services, Inc.
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[10] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001350, CCI-002475
[11] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[12] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.2 - Use of Cryptography
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13), Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_s3_bucket_storage.base
Abstract
La plantilla define un tema de SNS sin cifrar.
Explanation
De forma predeterminada, los temas de SNS no están cifrados en reposo. Esto potencialmente expone los datos a espectadores no autorizados.

Ejemplo 1: La siguiente plantilla de ejemplo no puede cifrar el tema de SNS al no definir un identificador de clave de AWS KMS.

{
"AWSTemplateFormatVersion": "2010-09-09",
"Description": "My SNS topic",
"Resources": {
"MySNSTopic": {
"Type": "AWS::SNS::Topic",
"Properties": {
"Subscription": [
{
"Endpoint": "MySNSEndpoint",
"Protocol": "sqs"
}
],
"TopicName": "MyTopic"
}
}
}
}
References
[1] Michelle Mercier and Otavio Ferreira AWS Compute Blog: Encrypting messages published to Amazon SNS with AWS KMS
[2] AWS Documentation AWS SNS - Encryption at rest
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark Confidentiality
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3500 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_sns_topic_storage.base
Abstract
La plantilla define un tema de SNS sin cifrar.
Explanation
De forma predeterminada, los temas de SNS no están cifrados en reposo. Esto potencialmente expone los datos a espectadores no autorizados.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo muestra una plantilla que no puede cifrar el tema de SNS al no definir un identificador de clave de AWS KMS.


AWSTemplateFormatVersion: 2010-09-09
Description: My SNS Topic
Resources:
MySNSTopic:
Type: AWS::SNS::Topic
Properties:
Subscription:
- Endpoint: "MySNSEndpoint"
Protocol: "sqs"
TopicName: "SampleTopic"
References
[1] Michelle Mercier and Otavio Ferreira AWS Compute Blog: Encrypting messages published to Amazon SNS with AWS KMS
[2] AWS Documentation AWS SNS - Encryption at rest
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark Confidentiality
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3500 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_sns_topic_storage.base
Abstract
La aplicación usa Touch ID para almacenar un elemento en las llaves, pero no restringe las huellas digitales válidas a aquellas que estaban disponibles cuando se almacenó el elemento de las llaves.
Explanation
La autenticación basada en Touch ID puede implementarse con los servicios de llaves mediante el almacenamiento de un elemento en las llaves y la configuración de un control de accesos que requiera que el usuario utilice su huella digital para recuperar el elemento más tarde. Las siguientes directivas pueden usarse para definir cómo se autenticará al usuario con su huella digital:

- kSecAccessControlUserPresence: restricción de acceso con Touch ID o un código de acceso. No es necesario que Touch ID esté disponible o registrado. Touch ID puede tener acceso al elemento aunque se agreguen o eliminen huellas digitales.
- kSecAccessControlTouchIDAny: restricción de acceso con Touch ID para las huellas digitales registradas. No se invalida el elemento si se agregan o eliminan huellas digitales.
- kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet: restricción de acceso con Touch ID para las huellas digitales registradas actualmente. Se invalida el elemento si se agregan o eliminan huellas digitales.

Cuando usa Touch ID, debe utilizar el atributo kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet para impedir que se agreguen o eliminen huellas digitales en el futuro.

Ejemplo 1: el siguiente código usa la restricción kSecAccessControlTouchIDAny que permite que el elemento de las llaves se desbloquee con cualquier huella digital que se registre en el futuro:


...
SecAccessControlRef sacRef = SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags(kCFAllocatorDefault,
kSecAttrAccessibleWhenPasscodeSetThisDeviceOnly,
kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet,
nil);
NSMutableDictionary *dict = [NSMutableDictionary dictionary];
[dict setObject:(__bridge id)kSecClassGenericPassword forKey:(__bridge id) kSecClass];
[dict setObject:account forKey:(__bridge id)kSecAttrAccount];
[dict setObject:service forKey:(__bridge id) kSecAttrService];
[dict setObject:token forKey:(__bridge id)kSecValueData];
...
[dict setObject:sacRef forKey:(__bridge id)kSecAttrAccessControl];
[dict setObject:@"Please authenticate using the Touch ID sensor." forKey:(__bridge id)kSecUseOperationPrompt];

dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0), ^{
OSStatus status = SecItemAdd((__bridge CFDictionaryRef)dict, nil);
});
...
References
[1] David Thiel iOS Application Security: The Definitive Guide for Hackers and Developers No Starch Press
[2] Integrating Touch ID Into Your iOS Applications Cigital
[3] Don't Touch Me That Way nVisium
[4] SecAccessControlCreateFlags Apple
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 3
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark normal
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 287
[10] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2019 [13] CWE ID 287
[11] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [14] CWE ID 287
[12] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [14] CWE ID 287
[13] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2022 [14] CWE ID 287
[14] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2023 [13] CWE ID 287
[15] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001958
[16] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM, SC
[17] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A9 Insecure Communications
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A9 Insufficient Transport Layer Protection
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A07 Identification and Authentication Failures
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.7.1 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.2 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.3 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.8.4 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.5 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 3.7.1 Defenses Against Session Management Exploits (L1 L2 L3), 9.2.3 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M5 Poor Authorization and Authentication
[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M3 Insecure Authentication/Authorization
[25] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-AUTH-1, MASVS-AUTH-2
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.10
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.3.1.4, Requirement 6.5.9
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control
[35] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control
[36] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.1.2 - Web Software Access Controls
[37] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[38] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[59] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[60] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Insufficient Authentication (WASC-01)
[61] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Insufficient Authentication
desc.dataflow.objc.biometric_authentication_insufficient_touch_id_protection
Abstract
La aplicación usa Touch ID para almacenar un elemento en las llaves, pero no restringe las huellas digitales válidas a aquellas que estaban disponibles cuando se almacenó el elemento de las llaves.
Explanation
La autenticación basada en Touch ID puede implementarse con los servicios de llaves mediante el almacenamiento de un elemento en las llaves y la configuración de un control de accesos que requiera que el usuario utilice su huella digital para recuperar el elemento más tarde. Las siguientes directivas pueden usarse para definir cómo se autenticará al usuario con su huella digital:

- kSecAccessControlUserPresence: restricción de acceso con Touch ID o un código de acceso. No es necesario que Touch ID esté disponible o registrado. Touch ID puede tener acceso al elemento aunque se agreguen o eliminen huellas digitales.
- kSecAccessControlTouchIDAny: restricción de acceso con Touch ID para las huellas digitales registradas. No se invalida el elemento si se agregan o eliminan huellas digitales.
- kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet: restricción de acceso con Touch ID para las huellas digitales registradas actualmente. Se invalida el elemento si se agregan o eliminan huellas digitales.

Cuando usa Touch ID, debe utilizar el atributo kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet para impedir que se agreguen o eliminen huellas digitales en el futuro.

Ejemplo 1: el siguiente código usa la restricción kSecAccessControlTouchIDAny que permite que el elemento de las llaves se desbloquee con cualquier huella digital que se registre en el futuro:


...
let flags = SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags(kCFAllocatorDefault,
kSecAttrAccessibleWhenPasscodeSetThisDeviceOnly,
.TouchIDAny,
nil)

var query = [String : AnyObject]()
query[kSecClass as String] = kSecClassGenericPassword
query[kSecAttrService as String] = service as AnyObject?
query[kSecAttrAccount as String] = account as AnyObject?
query[kSecValueData as String] = secret as AnyObject?
...
query[kSecAttrAccessControl as String] = sacRef
query[kSecUseOperationPrompt as String] = "Please authenticate using the Touch ID sensor."

SecItemAdd(query as CFDictionary, nil)
...
References
[1] David Thiel iOS Application Security: The Definitive Guide for Hackers and Developers No Starch Press
[2] Integrating Touch ID Into Your iOS Applications Cigital
[3] Don't Touch Me That Way nVisium
[4] SecAccessControlCreateFlags Apple
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 3
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark normal
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 287
[10] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2019 [13] CWE ID 287
[11] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [14] CWE ID 287
[12] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [14] CWE ID 287
[13] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2022 [14] CWE ID 287
[14] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2023 [13] CWE ID 287
[15] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001958
[16] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM, SC
[17] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A9 Insecure Communications
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A9 Insufficient Transport Layer Protection
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A07 Identification and Authentication Failures
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.7.1 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.2 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.3 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.8.4 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.5 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 3.7.1 Defenses Against Session Management Exploits (L1 L2 L3), 9.2.3 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M5 Poor Authorization and Authentication
[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M3 Insecure Authentication/Authorization
[25] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-AUTH-1, MASVS-AUTH-2
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.10
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.3.1.4, Requirement 6.5.9
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control
[35] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control
[36] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.1.2 - Web Software Access Controls
[37] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[38] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[59] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[60] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Insufficient Authentication (WASC-01)
[61] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Insufficient Authentication
desc.dataflow.swift.biometric_authentication_insufficient_touch_id_protection
Abstract
La etiqueta <cfdump> puede perder información confidencial en una aplicación web implementada.
Explanation
Es muy común generar valores de variables para depurar o realizar pruebas con el código que no se pretende enviar ni permanecer activo en la aplicación implementada. Cuando este tipo de código de depuración se deja accidentalmente en la aplicación, esta puede proporcionar información a un usuario malintencionado de forma no deseada. No todas las instrucciones de depuración pierden información confidencial o privada. Sin embargo, la presencia de una instrucción de depuración suele indicar que el código que lo rodea ha quedado desatendido y puede estar en un estado de deterioro.

El ejemplo de código de depuración olvidado en ColdFusion más común es la etiqueta <cfdump>. Aunque el uso de <cfdump> es aceptable durante el desarrollo del producto, los desarrolladores responsables del código que forma parte de una aplicación web de producción deben considerar cuidadosamente si se debe permitir el uso de la etiqueta <cfdump>.
References
[1] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 1
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark normal
[5] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 215
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2019 [4] CWE ID 200
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [7] CWE ID 200
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [20] CWE ID 200
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A05 Security Misconfiguration
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 8.3.4 Sensitive Private Data (L1 L2 L3), 14.3.2 Unintended Security Disclosure Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 3.6 - Sensitive Data Retention
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 3.6 - Sensitive Data Retention
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 3.6 - Sensitive Data Retention
[16] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3120 CAT II
[17] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3120 CAT II
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3120 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3120 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3120 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3120 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3120 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.semantic.cfml.coldfusion_badpractices_leftover_debug_code
Abstract
La imposibilidad de restringir la inclusión de una aplicación en un iframe puede generar falsificación de solicitud entre sitios o ataques de suplantación de identidad.
Explanation
Las vulnerabilidades de Cross-Site Scripting ocurren cuando una aplicación:

1. Permite que se incluya en un iframe.
2. No puede especificar la directiva de marcos a través del encabezado X-Frame-Options.
3. Utiliza protección deficiente, como lógica de reducción de marcos de JavaScript.

Las vulnerabilidades de Cross-Site Scripting con frecuencia forman la base de ataques de clickjacking que los atacantes pueden utilizar para realizar falsificación de solicitud entre sitios o ataques de suplantación de identidad.
References
[1] OWASP Cross Frame Scripting
[2] OWASP Clickjacking
[3] OWASP Clickjacking Defense Cheat Sheet
[4] Node.js Security Checklist
desc.dataflow.javascript.cross_frame_scripting
Abstract
La imposibilidad de restringir la inclusión de una aplicación en un iframe puede generar falsificación de solicitud entre sitios o ataques de suplantación de identidad.
Explanation
Las vulnerabilidades de Cross-Site Scripting ocurren cuando una aplicación:

1. Permite que se incluya en un iframe.
2. No puede especificar la directiva de marcos a través del encabezado X-Frame-Options.
3. Utiliza protección deficiente, como lógica de reducción de marcos de JavaScript.

Las vulnerabilidades de Cross-Site Scripting con frecuencia forman la base de ataques de clickjacking que los atacantes pueden utilizar para realizar falsificación de solicitud entre sitios o ataques de suplantación de identidad.
References
[1] OWASP Cross Frame Scripting
[2] OWASP Clickjacking
[3] OWASP Clickjacking Defense Cheat Sheet
[4] Clickjacking Protection
desc.structural.python.cross_frame_scripting