Reino: Code Quality

Códigos de baixa qualidade levam a comportamentos imprevisíveis. Da perspectiva do usuário, isso normalmente se manifesta como usabilidade ruim. Para um invasor, trata-se de uma oportunidade para atacar o sistema de formas imprevistas.

Intent Manipulation: Mutable Pending Intent

Java/JSP

Abstract

Uma PendingIntent foi detectada com seu valor de sinalizador definido como FLAG_MUTABLE. Intenções pendentes criadas com o valor do sinalizador de FLAG_MUTABLE são suscetíveis a ter campos não especificados Intent definido a jusante, que pode modificar a capacidade da Intent e deixar o sistema aberto a vulnerabilidades.

Explanation

Permitindo a modificação da Intent subjacente de uma PendingIntent após sua criação pode deixar um sistema aberto a ataques. Isso depende principalmente da capacidade geral da Intent subjacente. Na maioria dos casos, é uma prática recomendada evitar possíveis problemas definindo o sinalizador PendingIntent como FLAG_IMMUTABLE.

Exemplo 1: O seguinte inclui uma PendingIntent criada com um valor de sinalizador de FLAG_MUTABLE.


...
val intent_flag_mut = Intent(Intent.ACTION_GTALK_SERVICE_DISCONNECTED, Uri.EMPTY, this, DownloadService::class.java)
val flag_mut = PendingIntent.FLAG_MUTABLE

val pi_flagmutable = PendingIntent.getService(
    this,
    0,
    intent_flag_mut,
    flag_mut
)
...

References

[1] Remediation for Implicit PendingIntent Vulnerability

[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 1

[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark complete

[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4

[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1

[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark partial

[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity

[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark partial

[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 99

[10] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001094

[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data

[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-5 Denial of Service Protection (P1)

[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-5 Denial of Service Protection

[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A9 Application Denial of Service

[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1

[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1, Requirement 6.5.4

[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.8

[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.8

[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.8

[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.8

[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.8

[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4

[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP6080 CAT II

[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP6080 CAT II

[25] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP6080 CAT II

[26] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP6080 CAT II

[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP6080 CAT II

[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP6080 CAT II

[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP6080 CAT II

[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II

[44] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Denial of Service (WASC-10)

[45] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Denial of Service

desc.controlflow.java.intent_manipulation_mutable_pending_intent