Reino: Security Features
La seguridad de un software no es un software de seguridad. Nos preocupamos de cuestiones como la autenticación, el control de acceso, la confidencialidad, la criptografía y la gestión de privilegios.
Access Control: LDAP
Abstract
Sin un control de acceso adecuado, la ejecución de una instrucción LDAP que contenga un valor controlado por el usuario puede permitir a un atacante acceder a entradas de directorio no autorizadas.
Explanation
Se producen errores de control de acceso de base de datos cuando:
1. Los datos entran en un programa desde un origen que no es de confianza.
2. Los datos se utilizan para especificar un valor de datos en una consulta LDAP.
Ejemplo 1: el ID de empleado del usuario actualmente autenticado se envía de forma automática con cada solicitud mediante la interfaz de cliente. El código siguiente valida adecuadamente el nombre de empleado mediante una lista de permitidos antes de utilizarlo para crear una consulta LDAP. Esta validación impide la aparición de vulnerabilidades LDAP Injection, pero podría seguir dejando al código vulnerable.
El problema es que el desarrollador no ha tenido en cuenta qué pasaría si un atacante proporciona valores alternativos de
1. Los datos entran en un programa desde un origen que no es de confianza.
2. Los datos se utilizan para especificar un valor de datos en una consulta LDAP.
Ejemplo 1: el ID de empleado del usuario actualmente autenticado se envía de forma automática con cada solicitud mediante la interfaz de cliente. El código siguiente valida adecuadamente el nombre de empleado mediante una lista de permitidos antes de utilizarlo para crear una consulta LDAP. Esta validación impide la aparición de vulnerabilidades LDAP Injection, pero podría seguir dejando al código vulnerable.
static string AllowlistVerify(string name) {
Regex pattern = new Regex(@"^[a-zA-Z\-\.']+$");
if (pattern.IsMatch(name)) {
return name;
}
return null;
}
...
string verifiedName = AllowlistVerify(managerName.Text.trim());
if(verifiedName != null) {
DirectorySearcher src = new DirectorySearcher("(manager=" + verifiedName + ")");
src.SearchRoot = de;
src.SearchScope = SearchScope.Subtree;
foreach(SearchResult res in src.FindAll()) {
...
}
}
El problema es que el desarrollador no ha tenido en cuenta qué pasaría si un atacante proporciona valores alternativos de
empName
. Aunque la interfaz envíe automáticamente el ID de empleado al usuario actual, un atacante podría enviar un valor alternativo como parte de una solicitud maliciosa. Como el código de este ejemplo ejecuta la consulta bajo un vínculo anónimo, devolverá la entrada de directorio para un ID de empleado válido, independientemente de la identidad del usuario autenticado actualmente.References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 639
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2023 [24] CWE ID 863
[3] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000213, CCI-001084, CCI-002165
[4] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 AC
[5] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-3 Access Enforcement (P1), IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) (P1), IA-11 Re-Authentication (P0), SC-3 Security Function Isolation (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-3 Access Enforcement, IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users), SC-3 Security Function Isolation, SC-11 Trusted Path
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 4.1.2 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3), 4.1.3 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3), 4.1.5 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3), 4.2.1 Operation Level Access Control (L1 L2 L3)
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M5 Poor Authorization and Authentication
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M3 Insecure Authentication/Authorization
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-AUTH-1
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A2 Broken Access Control
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A4 Insecure Direct Object Reference
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A4 Insecure Direct Object References
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A4 Insecure Direct Object References
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A5 Broken Access Control
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.2
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.5.4
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.8
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.8
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.3 - Web Software Access Controls
[29] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 863
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3480.1 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3480.1 CAT I
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3480.1 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3480.1 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3480.1 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3480.1 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3480.1 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-001520 CAT II, APSC-DV-001530 CAT II, APSC-DV-001540 CAT I, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-001520 CAT II, APSC-DV-001530 CAT II, APSC-DV-001540 CAT I, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Insufficient Authorization (WASC-02)
[53] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Insufficient Authorization
desc.dataflow.dotnet.access_control_ldap
Abstract
Sin un control de acceso adecuado, la ejecución de una instrucción LDAP que contenga un valor controlado por el usuario puede permitir a un atacante acceder a entradas de directorio no autorizadas.
Explanation
Se producen errores de control de acceso de base de datos cuando:
1. Los datos entran en un programa desde un origen que no es de confianza.
2. Los datos se utilizan para especificar un valor de datos en una consulta LDAP.
Ejemplo 1: el código siguiente usa una lista de permitidos para validar el nombre de un empleado leído desde un socket antes de usarlo para construir una consulta LDAP. Esta validación impide la aparición de vulnerabilidades LDAP Injection, pero podría seguir dejando al código vulnerable.
El problema es que el desarrollador no ha tenido en cuenta qué pasaría si un atacante proporciona valores alternativos de
1. Los datos entran en un programa desde un origen que no es de confianza.
2. Los datos se utilizan para especificar un valor de datos en una consulta LDAP.
Ejemplo 1: el código siguiente usa una lista de permitidos para validar el nombre de un empleado leído desde un socket antes de usarlo para construir una consulta LDAP. Esta validación impide la aparición de vulnerabilidades LDAP Injection, pero podría seguir dejando al código vulnerable.
char* allowlist_verify(char* name) {
const char *error;
int errOffset;
char* regex = "^[a-zA-Z\\-\\.']+$";
pcre* re = pcre_compile(regex, 0, &err, &errOffset, NULL);
int rc = pcre_exec(re, NULL, name, strlen(name), 0, 0, NULL, 0);
if (rc == 1)
return name;
return NULL;
}
...
fgets(managerName, sizeof(managerName), socket);
char* verified_name = allowlist_verify(managerName);
if(verified_name != NULL) {
snprintf(filter, sizeof(filter), "(manager=%s)", verified_name);
if ( ( rc = ldap_search_ext_s( ld, FIND_DN, LDAP_SCOPE_BASE,
filter, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL, LDAP_NO_LIMIT,
LDAP_NO_LIMIT, &result ) ) == LDAP_SUCCESS ) {
...
}
}
El problema es que el desarrollador no ha tenido en cuenta qué pasaría si un atacante proporciona valores alternativos de
username
. Como el código de este ejemplo ejecuta la consulta bajo un vínculo anónimo, devolverá la entrada de directorio para un ID de empleado válido, independientemente de la identidad del usuario autenticado actualmente.References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 639
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2023 [24] CWE ID 863
[3] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000213, CCI-001084, CCI-002165
[4] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 AC
[5] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-3 Access Enforcement (P1), IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) (P1), IA-11 Re-Authentication (P0), SC-3 Security Function Isolation (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-3 Access Enforcement, IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users), SC-3 Security Function Isolation, SC-11 Trusted Path
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 4.1.2 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3), 4.1.3 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3), 4.1.5 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3), 4.2.1 Operation Level Access Control (L1 L2 L3)
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M5 Poor Authorization and Authentication
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M3 Insecure Authentication/Authorization
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-AUTH-1
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A2 Broken Access Control
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A4 Insecure Direct Object Reference
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A4 Insecure Direct Object References
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A4 Insecure Direct Object References
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A5 Broken Access Control
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.2
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.5.4
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.8
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.8
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.3 - Web Software Access Controls
[29] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 863
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3480.1 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3480.1 CAT I
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3480.1 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3480.1 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3480.1 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3480.1 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3480.1 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-001520 CAT II, APSC-DV-001530 CAT II, APSC-DV-001540 CAT I, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-001520 CAT II, APSC-DV-001530 CAT II, APSC-DV-001540 CAT I, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Insufficient Authorization (WASC-02)
[53] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Insufficient Authorization
desc.dataflow.cpp.access_control_ldap
Abstract
Sin un control de acceso adecuado, la ejecución de una instrucción LDAP que contenga un valor controlado por el usuario puede permitir a un atacante acceder a entradas de directorio no autorizadas.
Explanation
Se producen errores de control de acceso de base de datos cuando:
1. Los datos entran en un programa desde un origen que no es de confianza.
2. Los datos se utilizan para especificar un valor de datos en una consulta LDAP.
Ejemplo 1: El ID de empleado del usuario actualmente autenticado se envía automáticamente con cada solicitud mediante la interfaz de cliente. El código siguiente valida un ID de empleado como un entero antes de usarlo para construir una consulta LDAP. Esta validación impide la aparición de vulnerabilidades de inserción LDAP, pero podría seguir dejando al código vulnerable.
El problema es que el desarrollador no ha tenido en cuenta qué pasaría si un atacante proporciona valores alternativos de
1. Los datos entran en un programa desde un origen que no es de confianza.
2. Los datos se utilizan para especificar un valor de datos en una consulta LDAP.
Ejemplo 1: El ID de empleado del usuario actualmente autenticado se envía automáticamente con cada solicitud mediante la interfaz de cliente. El código siguiente valida un ID de empleado como un entero antes de usarlo para construir una consulta LDAP. Esta validación impide la aparición de vulnerabilidades de inserción LDAP, pero podría seguir dejando al código vulnerable.
...
env.put(Context.SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION, "none");
DirContext ctx = new InitialDirContext(env);
String empID = request.getParameter("empID");
try
{
int id = Integer.parseInt(empID);
BasicAttribute attr = new BasicAttribute("empID", empID);
NamingEnumeration employee =
ctx.search("ou=People,dc=example,dc=com",attr);
...
El problema es que el desarrollador no ha tenido en cuenta qué pasaría si un atacante proporciona valores alternativos de
empID
. Aunque la interfaz envíe automáticamente el ID de empleado al usuario actual, un atacante podría enviar un valor alternativo como parte de una solicitud maliciosa. Como el código de este ejemplo ejecuta la consulta bajo un vínculo anónimo, devolverá la entrada de directorio para un ID de empleado válido, independientemente de la identidad del usuario autenticado actualmente.References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 639
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2023 [24] CWE ID 863
[3] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000213, CCI-001084, CCI-002165
[4] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 AC
[5] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-3 Access Enforcement (P1), IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) (P1), IA-11 Re-Authentication (P0), SC-3 Security Function Isolation (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-3 Access Enforcement, IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users), SC-3 Security Function Isolation, SC-11 Trusted Path
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 4.1.2 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3), 4.1.3 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3), 4.1.5 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3), 4.2.1 Operation Level Access Control (L1 L2 L3)
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M5 Poor Authorization and Authentication
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M3 Insecure Authentication/Authorization
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-AUTH-1
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A2 Broken Access Control
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A4 Insecure Direct Object Reference
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A4 Insecure Direct Object References
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A4 Insecure Direct Object References
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A5 Broken Access Control
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.2
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.5.4
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.8
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.8
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.3 - Web Software Access Controls
[29] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 863
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3480.1 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3480.1 CAT I
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3480.1 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3480.1 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3480.1 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3480.1 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3480.1 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-001520 CAT II, APSC-DV-001530 CAT II, APSC-DV-001540 CAT I, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-001520 CAT II, APSC-DV-001530 CAT II, APSC-DV-001540 CAT I, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Insufficient Authorization (WASC-02)
[53] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Insufficient Authorization
desc.dataflow.java.access_control_ldap