Reino: Security Features
La seguridad de un software no es un software de seguridad. Nos preocupamos de cuestiones como la autenticación, el control de acceso, la confidencialidad, la criptografía y la gestión de privilegios.
Weak Encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] distributed.net DES
[2] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[3] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[4] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[5] NIST Special Publication 800-132 NIST
[6] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[8] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.semantic.abap.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] distributed.net DES
[2] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[3] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[4] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[5] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.semantic.dotnet.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] EVP_EncryptInit(3) The OpenSSL Project
[2] distributed.net DES
[3] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[4] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[5] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[6] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[8] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.semantic.cpp.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] Java Cryptography Architecture Standard Algorithm Name Documentation Sun Microsystems
[2] distributed.net DES
[3] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[4] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[5] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[6] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[8] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.semantic.cfml.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados, como DES, ya no ofrecen una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, los atacantes pueden descifrar DES en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] Java Cryptography Architecture Standard Algorithm Name Documentation Sun Microsystems
[2] distributed.net DES
[3] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[4] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[5] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[6] NIST Special Publication 800-132 NIST
[7] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[59] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.semantic.golang.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] Java Cryptography Architecture Standard Algorithm Name Documentation Sun Microsystems
[2] distributed.net DES
[3] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[4] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[5] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[6] NIST Special Publication 800-132 NIST
[7] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[59] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.semantic.java.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] Java Cryptography Architecture Standard Algorithm Name Documentation Sun Microsystems
[2] distributed.net DES
[3] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[4] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[5] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[6] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[8] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.structural.javascript.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados, especialmente los que usan claves de tamaño insuficiente, ya no ofrecen protección suficiente para datos confidenciales, ya que los avances tecnológicos permiten obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable mediante ataques por fuerza bruta. Por ejemplo, la clave de 64 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970 cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo, pero hoy en día DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
Ejemplo 1: el código siguiente realiza el cifrado con un algoritmo inseguro (DES):
Ejemplo 1: el código siguiente realiza el cifrado con un algoritmo inseguro (DES):
...
CCCrypt(kCCEncrypt,
kCCAlgorithmDES,
kCCOptionPKCS7Padding,
key,
kCCKeySizeDES, // 64-bit key size
iv,
plaintext,
sizeof(plaintext),
ciphertext,
sizeof(ciphertext),
&numBytesEncrypted);
...
References
[1] EVP_EncryptInit(3) The OpenSSL Project
[2] distributed.net DES
[3] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[4] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[5] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[6] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[7] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[8] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.structural.objc.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] Mcrypt ciphers The PHP Group
[2] mcrypt_encrypt The PHP Group
[3] distributed.net DES
[4] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[5] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[6] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[7] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[59] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.structural.php.weak_encryption
Abstract
El programa utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] distributed.net DES
[2] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[3] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[4] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[5] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.semantic.python.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] distributed.net DES
[2] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[3] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[4] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[5] NIST Special Publication 800-132 NIST
[6] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[8] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.structural.ruby.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados, especialmente los que usan claves de tamaño insuficiente, ya no ofrecen protección suficiente para datos confidenciales, ya que los avances tecnológicos permiten obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable mediante ataques por fuerza bruta. Por ejemplo, la clave de 64 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
Ejemplo 1: el código siguiente realiza el cifrado con un algoritmo inseguro (DES):
Ejemplo 1: el código siguiente realiza el cifrado con un algoritmo inseguro (DES):
...
let iv = getTrueRandomIV()
...
let cStatus = CCCrypt(UInt32(kCCEncrypt),
UInt32(kCCAlgorithmDES),
UInt32(kCCOptionPKCS7Padding),
key,
keyLength,
iv,
plaintext,
plaintextLength,
ciphertext,
ciphertextLength,
&numBytesEncrypted)
...
References
[1] EVP_EncryptInit(3) The OpenSSL Project
[2] distributed.net DES
[3] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[4] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[5] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[6] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[7] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[8] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.structural.swift.weak_encryption
Abstract
Un algoritmo de cifrado débil no pueden garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados, como DES, ya no ofrecen una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] Java Cryptography Architecture Standard Algorithm Name Documentation Sun Microsystems
[2] distributed.net DES
[3] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[4] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[5] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[6] NIST Special Publication 800-132 NIST
[7] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[59] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.config.xml.weak_encryption
Abstract
La llamada identificada utiliza un algoritmo de cifrado débil que no puede garantizar la confidencialidad de los datos confidenciales.
Explanation
Los algoritmos de cifrado anticuados como DES dejarán de ofrecer una protección suficiente para su uso con los datos confidenciales. Los algoritmos de cifrado se basan en el tamaño de la clave como uno de los mecanismos principales para garantizar la intensidad criptográfica. La intensidad criptográfica a menudo se mide por el tiempo y la capacidad computacional de cálculo necesarios para generar una clave válida. Los avances en la capacidad de cálculo han hecho posible obtener claves de cifrado pequeñas en un período de tiempo razonable. Por ejemplo, la clave de 56 bits utilizada en DES supuso un importante obstáculo computacional en la década de 1970, cuando se desarrolló por primera vez el algoritmo. Actualmente, DES se puede descifrar en menos de un día con equipos de uso generalizado.
References
[1] Java Cryptography Architecture Standard Algorithm Name Documentation Sun Microsystems
[2] distributed.net DES
[3] FAQ About the Electronic Frontier Foundation's "DES Cracker" Machine Electronic Frontier Foundation
[4] SDL Development Practices Microsoft
[5] Microsoft Security Fundamentals Microsoft
[6] John Kelsey, Bruce Schneier, and David Wagner Related-key cryptanalysis of 3-WAY, Biham-DES, CAST, DES-X, NewDES, RC2, and TEA
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[8] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002450, CCI-002478
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), IA-5 Authenticator Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, IA-5 Authenticator Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.6.2 Cryptographic Architectural Requirements (L2 L3), 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.2 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.3 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.1 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.3 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.4 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.5 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.2.6 Algorithms (L2 L3), 6.4.2 Secret Management (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M6 Broken Cryptography
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CRYPTO-1
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[35] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 327
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3150.1 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3150.1 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3150.1 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3150.1 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3150.1 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3150.1 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3150.1 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II, APSC-DV-002040 CAT II, APSC-DV-003100 CAT II, APSC-DV-003310 CAT II
desc.structural.vb.weak_encryption