2 itens encontrados
Vulnerabilidades
Abstract
Referenciar a memória depois de ela ter sido liberada pode fazer com que um programa trave.
Explanation
Erros de uso após a liberação podem ocorrer quando um programa continua a usar um ponteiro depois que ele é liberado. Como erros de liberação dupla e vazamentos de memória, erros de uso após a liberação têm duas causas comuns e por vezes sobrepostas:

- Condições de erro e outras circunstâncias excepcionais.

- Confusão acerca de qual parte do programa é responsável por liberar a memória.

Erros de uso após a liberação às vezes não têm nenhum efeito e outras vezes fazem com que um programa falhe. Embora seja tecnicamente possível que a memória liberada seja realocada e que um invasor use essa realocação para lançar um ataque de buffer overflow, não temos conhecimento de qualquer exploração com base nesse tipo de ataque.

Exemplo: O código a seguir ilustra um erro de uso após a liberação:


char* ptr = (char*)malloc (SIZE);
...
if (err) {
abrt = 1;
free(ptr);
}
...
if (abrt) {
logError("operation aborted before commit", ptr);
}
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 416
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2019 [1] CWE ID 119, [7] CWE ID 416
[3] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [5] CWE ID 119, [8] CWE ID 416
[4] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [7] CWE ID 416, [17] CWE ID 119
[5] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2022 [7] CWE ID 416, [19] CWE ID 119
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2023 [4] CWE ID 416, [17] CWE ID 119
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001094
[8] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[9] Standards Mapping - Motor Industry Software Reliability Association (MISRA) C Guidelines 2012 Rule 21.3
[10] Standards Mapping - Motor Industry Software Reliability Association (MISRA) C++ Guidelines 2008 Rule 18-4-1
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-5 Denial of Service Protection (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-5 Denial of Service Protection
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A9 Application Denial of Service
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.9
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.6
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.6
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.6
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.6
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP6080 CAT II
[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP6080 CAT II
[25] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP6080 CAT II
[26] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP6080 CAT II
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP6080 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP6080 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP6080 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002400 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Denial of Service (WASC-10)
[45] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Denial of Service
desc.controlflow.cpp.use_after_free
Abstract
A construção de uma expressão XQuery dinâmica com uma entrada de usuário pode permitir que um invasor modifique o significado da instrução.
Explanation
Uma injeção de XQuery ocorre quando:

1. Os dados entram em um programa por uma fonte não confiável.



2. Os dados utilizados para construir dinamicamente uma expressão XQuery.

Exemplo 1: O código a seguir constrói e executa dinamicamente uma expressão XQuery que recupera uma conta de usuário para uma determinada combinação de nome de usuário e senha. O nome de usuário e a senha são lidos de uma solicitação HTTP e, portanto, não são confiáveis.


...

String squery = "for \$user in doc(users.xml)//user[username='" + Request["username"] + "'and pass='" + Request["password"] + "'] return \$user";

Processor processor = new Processor();

XdmNode indoc = processor.NewDocumentBuilder().Build(new Uri(Server.MapPath("users.xml")));

StreamReader query = new StreamReader(squery);
XQueryCompiler compiler = processor.NewXQueryCompiler();
XQueryExecutable exp = compiler.Compile(query.ReadToEnd());
XQueryEvaluator eval = exp.Load();
eval.ContextItem = indoc;

Serializer qout = new Serializer();
qout.SetOutputProperty(Serializer.METHOD, "xml");
qout.SetOutputProperty(Serializer.DOCTYPE_PUBLIC, "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN");
qout.SetOutputProperty(Serializer.DOCTYPE_SYSTEM, "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd");
qout.SetOutputProperty(Serializer.INDENT, "yes");
qout.SetOutputProperty(Serializer.OMIT_XML_DECLARATION, "no");

qout.SetOutputWriter(Response.Output);
eval.Run(qout);

...


Em condições normais, tais como ao procurar uma conta de usuário com o nome de usuário e a senha apropriados, a expressão que esse código executa terá a seguinte aparência:

for \$user in doc(users.xml)//user[username='test_user' and pass='pass123'] return \$user

No entanto, como a expressão é construída dinamicamente por meio da concatenação de uma cadeia de consulta base constante e de uma cadeia de entrada do usuário, ela se comportará corretamente somente se username ou password não contiver um caractere de aspas simples. Se um invasor inserir a string admin' or 1=1 or ''=' para username, a consulta se tornará a seguinte:

for \$user in doc(users.xml)//user[username='admin' or 1=1 or ''='' and password='x' or ''=''] return \$user

A adição da condição admin' or 1=1 or ''=' faz com que a expressão XQuery sempre seja avaliada como "true" e, portanto, a consulta torna-se logicamente equivalente à seguinte consulta muito mais simples:

//user[username='admin']

Essa simplificação da consulta permite que o invasor ignore a exigência de que a consulta deva corresponder à senha. Agora, ela retorna o usuário administrador armazenado no documento, independentemente da senha inserida.
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 652
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M7 Client Side Injection
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CODE-4
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A6 Injection Flaws
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A2 Injection Flaws
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A1 Injection
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A1 Injection
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A1 Injection
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A03 Injection
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.6
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1, Requirement 6.5.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 XQuery Injection (WASC-46)
desc.dataflow.dotnet.xquery_injection
Abstract
A construção de uma expressão XQuery dinâmica com uma entrada de usuário pode permitir que um invasor modifique o significado da instrução.
Explanation
Uma injeção de XQuery ocorre quando:

1. Os dados entram em um programa por uma fonte não confiável.



2. Os dados utilizados para construir dinamicamente uma expressão XQuery.

Exemplo 1: O código a seguir constrói e executa dinamicamente uma expressão XQuery que recupera uma conta de usuário para uma determinada combinação de nome de usuário e senha. O nome de usuário e a senha são lidos de uma solicitação HTTP e, portanto, não são confiáveis.


...
XQDataSource xqs = new XQDataSource();
XQConnection conn = xqs.getConnection();
String query = "for \$user in doc(users.xml)//user[username='" + request.getParameter("username") + "'and pass='" + request.getParameter("password") + "'] return \$user";

XQPreparedExpression xqpe = conn.prepareExpression(query);

XQResultSequence rs = xqpe.executeQuery();

...


Em condições normais, tais como ao procurar uma conta de usuário com o nome de usuário e a senha apropriados, a expressão que esse código executa terá a seguinte aparência:

for \$user in doc(users.xml)//user[username='test_user' and pass='pass123'] return \$user

No entanto, como a expressão é construída dinamicamente por meio da concatenação de uma cadeia de consulta base constante e de uma cadeia de entrada do usuário, seu comportamento só será correto se username ou password não contiver um caractere de aspas simples. Se um invasor inserir a string admin' or 1=1 or ''=' para username, a consulta se tornará a seguinte:

for \$user in doc(users.xml)//user[username='admin' or 1=1 or ''='' and password='x' or ''=''] return \$user

A adição da condição admin' or 1=1 or ''=' faz com que a expressão XQuery sempre seja avaliada como "true" e, portanto, a consulta torna-se logicamente equivalente à seguinte consulta muito mais simples:

//user[username='admin']

Essa simplificação da consulta permite que o invasor ignore a exigência de que a consulta deve corresponder à senha. Agora, ela retorna o usuário administrador armazenado no documento, independentemente da senha inserida.
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 652
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M7 Client Side Injection
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CODE-4
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A6 Injection Flaws
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A2 Injection Flaws
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A1 Injection
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A1 Injection
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A1 Injection
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A03 Injection
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.6
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1, Requirement 6.5.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 XQuery Injection (WASC-46)
desc.dataflow.java.xquery_injection
Abstract
A construção de uma expressão XQuery dinâmica com uma entrada de usuário pode permitir que um invasor modifique o significado da instrução.
Explanation
Uma injeção de XQuery ocorre quando:

1. Os dados entram em um programa por uma fonte não confiável.



2. Os dados são usados para construir dinamicamente uma consulta XQuery.

Exemplo 1: O código a seguir constrói e executa dinamicamente uma expressão XQuery que recupera uma conta de usuário para uma determinada combinação de nome de usuário e senha. O nome de usuário e a senha são lidos de uma solicitação HTTP e, portanto, não são confiáveis.


...

$memstor = InMemoryStore::getInstance();
$z = Zorba::getInstance($memstor);

try {
// get data manager
$dataman = $z->getXmlDataManager();

// load external XML document
$dataman->loadDocument('users.xml', file_get_contents('users.xml'));

// create and compile query
$express =
"for \$user in doc(users.xml)//user[username='" . $_GET["username"] . "'and pass='" . $_GET["password"] . "'] return \$user"

$query = $zorba->compileQuery($express);

// execute query
$result = $query->execute();



?>
...


Em condições normais, tais como ao procurar uma conta de usuário com o nome de usuário e a senha apropriados, a expressão que esse código executa terá a seguinte aparência:

for \$user in doc(users.xml)//user[username='test_user' and pass='pass123'] return \$user

No entanto, como a expressão é construída dinamicamente pela concatenação de uma cadeia de caracteres de consulta constante e uma cadeia de caracteres de entrada de usuário, a consulta só se comportará corretamente se username ou password não tiver um caractere de aspas simples. Se um invasor inserir a string admin' or 1=1 or ''=' para username, a consulta se tornará a seguinte:

for \$user in doc(users.xml)//user[username='admin' or 1=1 or ''='' and password='x' or ''=''] return \$user

A adição da condição admin' or 1=1 or ''=' faz com que a expressão XQuery sempre seja avaliada como "true" e, portanto, a consulta torna-se logicamente equivalente à seguinte consulta muito mais simples:

//user[username='admin']

Essa simplificação da consulta permite que o invasor ignore a exigência de que a consulta deve corresponder à senha. Agora, ela retorna o usuário administrador armazenado no documento, independentemente da senha inserida.
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 652
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M7 Client Side Injection
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CODE-4
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A6 Injection Flaws
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A2 Injection Flaws
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A1 Injection
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A1 Injection
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A1 Injection
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A03 Injection
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.6
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1, Requirement 6.5.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 XQuery Injection (WASC-46)
desc.dataflow.php.xquery_injection