185 itens encontrados
Vulnerabilidades

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insecure SageMaker Transport

Abstract
Uma configuração define uma regra de rede com permissões de acesso excessivamente amplas.
Explanation
Configurações de acesso livre podem expor sistemas e ampliar a superfície de ataque de uma organização. Os serviços abertos à interação com o público são normalmente submetidos a varreduras e investigações quase contínuas por entidades mal-intencionadas.

Isso é especialmente problemático quando uma exploração de dia zero para um serviço exposto é descoberta e publicada, como Heartbleed. Os invasores podem perseguir e pesquisar ativamente sistemas não corrigidos e expostos para explorá-los.
References
[1] Josh Fruhlinger CSOOnline: The Heartbleed bug: How a flaw in OpenSSL caused a security crisis
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 749
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [25] CWE ID 862
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [18] CWE ID 862
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000213, CCI-001084, CCI-002165
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-6 Least Privilege (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-6 Least Privilege
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A2 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A4 Insecure Direct Object Reference
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A4 Insecure Direct Object References
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A4 Insecure Direct Object References
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A5 Broken Access Control
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 4.1.3 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3)
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.2
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.5.4
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.8
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.8
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.8
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 1.4.2
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.3 - Web Software Access Controls
[32] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 285
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 863
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 863
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3480.1 CAT II
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3480.1 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3480.1 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3480.1 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3480.1 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3480.1 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3480.1 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Insufficient Authorization (WASC-02)
[56] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Insufficient Authorization
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_improper_network_access_control.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insecure SNS Topic Storage

Abstract
O modelo define um tópico SNS não criptografado.
Explanation
Por padrão, os tópicos SNS não são criptografados em repouso. Isso expõe, possivelmente, os dados a visualizadores não autorizados.

Exemplo 1: O modelo de exemplo a seguir falha ao criptografar o tópico SNS ao negligenciar a definição de um identificador de chave AWS KMS.

{
    "AWSTemplateFormatVersion": "2010-09-09",
    "Description": "My SNS topic",
    "Resources": {
        "MySNSTopic": {
            "Type": "AWS::SNS::Topic",
            "Properties": {
                "Subscription": [
                    {
                        "Endpoint": "MySNSEndpoint",
                        "Protocol": "sqs"
                    }
                ],
                "TopicName": "MyTopic"
            }
        }
    }
}
References
[1] Michelle Mercier and Otavio Ferreira AWS Compute Blog: Encrypting messages published to Amazon SNS with AWS KMS
[2] AWS Documentation AWS SNS - Encryption at rest
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2.0
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark Confidentiality
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3500 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_sns_topic_storage.base
Abstract
O modelo define um tópico SNS não criptografado.
Explanation
Por padrão, os tópicos SNS não são criptografados em repouso. Isso expõe, possivelmente, os dados a visualizadores não autorizados.

Exemplo 1: O exemplo a seguir mostra um modelo que falha ao criptografar o tópico SNS por negligenciar a definição de um identificador de chave AWS KMS.


AWSTemplateFormatVersion: 2010-09-09
Description: My SNS Topic
Resources:
  MySNSTopic:
    Type: AWS::SNS::Topic
    Properties:
      Subscription:
        - Endpoint: "MySNSEndpoint"
      Protocol: "sqs"
      TopicName: "SampleTopic"
References
[1] Michelle Mercier and Otavio Ferreira AWS Compute Blog: Encrypting messages published to Amazon SNS with AWS KMS
[2] AWS Documentation AWS SNS - Encryption at rest
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2.0
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark Confidentiality
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3500 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_sns_topic_storage.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insecure WorkSpaces Storage

Abstract
Uma configuração cria um recurso sem criptografia em repouso.
Explanation
A criptografia em repouso não está habilitada. Isso expõe os dados a acesso não autorizado e possível roubo.
References
[1] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4.5
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[8] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001350, CCI-002475
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 6.1.1 Data Classification (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insecure_storage.base
Abstract
Uma configuração cria um recurso sem criptografia em repouso.
Explanation
A criptografia em repouso não está habilitada. Isso expõe os dados a acesso não autorizado e possível roubo.
References
[1] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4.5
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[8] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001350, CCI-002475
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 6.1.1 Data Classification (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insecure_storage.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient API Gateway Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient AppSync Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient CloudFront Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient CloudFront Monitoring

Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base
Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient CloudTrail Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um CloudTrail que não está habilitado para todas as regiões.
Explanation
Por padrão, uma trilha registra eventos apenas na região AWS onde foi criada.

Isso permite que atividades não auditadas e não monitoradas ocorram na infraestrutura AWS da organização.

Por exemplo, um usuário autorizado da AWS pode fazer alterações de configuração que causam danos à organização e evitam a detecção.
References
[1] Amazon Web Services Security at Scale: Logging in AWS
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark complete
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark partial
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A6 Security Misconfiguration
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A5 Security Misconfiguration
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.10, Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.iac.aws.ismultiregiontrail.base
Abstract
O modelo define um CloudTrail que não está habilitado para todas as regiões.
Explanation
Por padrão, uma trilha registra eventos apenas na região AWS onde foi criada.

Isso permite que atividades não auditadas e não monitoradas ocorram na infraestrutura AWS da organização.

Por exemplo, um usuário autorizado da AWS pode fazer alterações de configuração que causam danos à organização e evitam a detecção.
References
[1] Amazon Web Services Security at Scale: Logging in AWS
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark complete
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark partial
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A6 Security Misconfiguration
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A5 Security Misconfiguration
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.10, Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.iac.aws.ismultiregiontrail.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient CloudTrail Monitoring

Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base
Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient Config Monitoring

Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base
Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient DocumentDB Logging

Abstract
O modelo não implementa monitoramento de log.
Explanation
O modelo não encaminha logs de auditoria para o Amazon CloudWatch para monitoramento. Isso pode permitir que o comportamento mal-intencionado não seja detectado e causar a atrasos na resposta a incidentes.
References
[1] Amazon Web Services Security best practices in AWS CloudTrail
[2] Amazon Web Services Publishing Neptune Logs to Amazon CloudWatch Logs
[3] Amazon Web Services Using Audit Logs with Amazon Neptune Clusters
[4] Amazon Web Services Logging and Monitoring in Amazon DocumentDB
[5] Amazon Web Services Auditing Amazon DocumentDB Events
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[9] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[10] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[11] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark partial
[12] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[13] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[14] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[15] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[16] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[17] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A6 Security Misconfiguration
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A5 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[25] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.10, Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[35] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[36] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.iac.aws.missing_cloudwatch_integration.base
Abstract
O modelo não implementa monitoramento de log.
Explanation
O modelo não encaminha logs de auditoria para o Amazon CloudWatch para monitoramento. Isso pode permitir que o comportamento mal-intencionado não seja detectado e causar a atrasos na resposta a incidentes.
References
[1] Amazon Web Services Security best practices in AWS CloudTrail
[2] Amazon Web Services Publishing Neptune Logs to Amazon CloudWatch Logs
[3] Amazon Web Services Using Audit Logs with Amazon Neptune Clusters
[4] Amazon Web Services Logging and Monitoring in Amazon DocumentDB
[5] Amazon Web Services Auditing Amazon DocumentDB Events
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[9] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[10] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[11] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark partial
[12] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[13] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[14] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[15] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[16] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[17] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A6 Security Misconfiguration
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A5 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[25] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.10, Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[35] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[36] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.iac.aws.missing_cloudwatch_integration.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient ECR Monitoring

Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base
Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient ElasticLoadBalancing Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient Elasticsearch Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient ELB Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient GuardDuty Monitoring

Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base
Abstract
Uma configuração estabelece um recurso que carece de monitoramento.
Explanation
Uma resposta atrasada a violações prejudica a capacidade de uma organização de limitar o impacto de uma violação.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de monitoramento incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desabilitar deliberadamente o monitoramento
- não habilitar o monitoramento opcional
- não especificar eventos relevantes para exportar para serviços de monitoramento
- isentar do monitoramento ações de usuários, grupos, processos e regiões geográficas específicos
References
[1] Paul Cichonski,Tom Millar,Tim Grance,Karen Scarfone NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 2 - Computer Security Incident Handling Guide
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_monitoring.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient Lambda Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient Log Group Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um Grupo do CloudWatch Log sem período de retenção.
Explanation
Por padrão, os Grupos do CloudWatch Log retêm logs indefinidamente. Um valor não definido indica que as políticas de tratamento de dados organizacionais não foram consultadas para definir as configurações apropriadas. Isso pode significar que a organização incorrerá em despesas desnecessárias no armazenamento e gerenciamento de eventos de registro que não são mais relevantes.

Um invasor pode lançar um ataque de negação de carteira (DoW), solicitando persistentemente o registro de eventos espúrios por um longo período de tempo, o que pode impactar a organização financeiramente.

Exemplo 1: O exemplo a seguir mostra um modelo que não consegue definir uma política de retenção.


{
    "AWSTemplateFormatVersion": "2010-09-09",
    "Resources": {
        "MyLogGroup": {
            "Type": "AWS::Logs::LogGroup",
            "Properties": {
                "LogGroupName": "Service01LogGroup"
            }
        }
    }
}
References
[1] Tal Melamed and Marcin Hoppe OWASP Serverless Top 10 (2017)
[2] AWS AWS Documentation: Working with Log Groups and Log Streams
[3] Daniel Kelly, Frank G.Glavin, Enda Barrett Journal of Information Security and Applications: Denial of wallet—Defining a looming threat to serverless computing
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A6 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A5 Security Misconfiguration
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.10, Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insufficient_log_group_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um Grupo do CloudWatch Log sem período de retenção.
Explanation
Por padrão, os Grupos do CloudWatch Log retêm logs indefinidamente. Um valor não definido indica que as políticas de tratamento de dados organizacionais não foram consultadas para definir as configurações apropriadas. Isso pode significar que a organização incorrerá em despesas desnecessárias no armazenamento e gerenciamento de eventos de registro que não são mais relevantes.

Um invasor pode lançar um ataque de negação de carteira (DoW), solicitando persistentemente o registro de eventos espúrios por um longo período de tempo, o que pode impactar a organização financeiramente.

Exemplo 1: O exemplo a seguir mostra um modelo que não consegue definir uma política de retenção.

AWSTemplateFormatVersion: "2010-09-09"
Resources:
  MyLogGroup:
    Type: AWS::Logs::LogGroup
  Properties:
    LogGroupName: Service01LogGroup
References
[1] Tal Melamed and Marcin Hoppe OWASP Serverless Top 10 (2017)
[2] AWS AWS Documentation: Working with Log Groups and Log Streams
[3] Daniel Kelly, Frank G.Glavin, Enda Barrett Journal of Information Security and Applications: Denial of wallet—Defining a looming threat to serverless computing
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[11] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A6 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A5 Security Misconfiguration
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.10, Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3680.4 CAT II, APP3680.5 CAT II
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insufficient_log_group_logging.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient MQ Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Insufficient MSK Logging

Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
O modelo define um serviço com log de auditoria insuficiente.
Explanation
A falta de registros de auditoria limita a capacidade de detectar e responder a incidentes relacionados à segurança e impede a investigação forense.

As definições de configuração que prejudicam os recursos de registro incluem, mas não estão limitadas a:
- desativar deliberadamente o log de auditoria
- isentar o log de ações de usuários, grupos ou processos específicos
- proteger inadequadamente a integridade do log
- não habilitar o log de auditoria opcional
- reduzir a taxa de amostragem de log
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5.0
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3.0
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base