界: Input Validation and Representation

输入验证与表示问题是由元字符、交替编码和数字表示引起的。安全问题源于信任输入。这些问题包括：“Buffer Overflows”、“Cross-Site Scripting”攻击、“SQL Injection”等其他问题。

gRPC Metadata Manipulation

C#/VB.NET/ASP.NET
Java/JSP

Abstract

通过不可信数据源创建了一个 Google Remote Procedure Call (gRPC) Metadata 对象，这可能会允许攻击者控制关键协议字段。

Explanation

Metadata 类通常用于存放 Google Remote Procedure Call (gRPC) 使用的基本协议的标头数据。当基本协议为 HTTP 时，控制 Metadata 对象中的数据会使系统容易受到 HTTP Header Manipulation 的攻击。也可能会导致其他攻击向量，且这些攻击向量主要基于基本协议。

示例 1：以下代码显示了用作 gRPC Metadata 对象的输入的不可信数据。


    ...
    String? evnVar = System.Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("evnVar ");
    Metadata headers = new Metadata();
    headers.Add("field", evnVar);
    CallOptions callOptions = new CallOptions(headers);
    ...

References

[1] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754

[2] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI

[3] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data

[4] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)

[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation

[6] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API3 Broken Object Property Level Authorization

[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M8 Security Decisions Via Untrusted Inputs

[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation

[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-CODE-4, MASVS-PLATFORM-1

[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input

[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A2 Injection Flaws

[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A1 Injection

[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A1 Injection

[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A1 Injection

[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A03 Injection

[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1

[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1, Requirement 6.5.2

[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1

[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1

[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1

[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1

[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1

[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4

[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 6.2.4

[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection

[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation

[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation

[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I

[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I

[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I

[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I

[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I

[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I

[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I

[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I

desc.dataflow.dotnet.grpc_metadata_manipulation

Abstract

通过一个不可信数据源创建了一个 Google Remote Procedure Call (gRPC) Metadata 对象，这可能会允许攻击者控制关键协议字段。

Explanation


...
String badData = getUserInput();
Metadata headers = new Metadata();
headers.put(Metadata.Key.of("sample", Metadata.ASCII_STRING_MARSHALLER), badData);
...