界: Input Validation and Representation
輸入驗證和表示法問題是由中繼字元、替代編碼和數值表示法引起的。信任輸入會導致安全問題。問題包括:「Buffer Overflows」、「Cross-Site Scripting」攻擊、「SQL Injection」及其他許多問題。
Open Redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站點內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 ABAP 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 ABAP 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
dest
要求參數解析的 URL。
...
DATA: str_dest TYPE c.
str_dest = request->get_form_field( 'dest' ).
response->redirect( str_dest ).
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.abap.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站點內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:使用者按一下連結時,下列 ActionScript 程式碼就會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:使用者按一下連結時,下列 ActionScript 程式碼就會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
dest
要求參數所讀取的 URL。
...
var params:Object = LoaderInfo(this.root.loaderInfo).parameters;
var strDest:String = String(params["dest"]);
host.updateLocation(strDest);
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.actionscript.open_redirect
Abstract
某個檔案會將未經驗證的資料傳遞到 HTTP 重新導向。
Explanation
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中所使用的 URL 有助於網路釣魚攻擊。重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會使用重新導向協助站台內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至攻擊者可以控制的任意 URL 時,會發生 Open Redirect 弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:以下 Visualforce 動作方法會傳回
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.vf.force.com/apex/vfpage?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要始終檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,並確定連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者以下列方式編碼的目的地 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙而點閱連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:以下 Visualforce 動作方法會傳回
PageReference
物件,其包含來自 dest
要求參數的 URL。
public PageReference pageAction() {
...
PageReference ref = ApexPages.currentPage();
Map<String,String> params = ref.getParameters();
return new PageReference(params.get('dest'));
}
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.vf.force.com/apex/vfpage?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要始終檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,並確定連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者以下列方式編碼的目的地 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙而點閱連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.apex.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站點內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
dest
要求參數所解析的 URL。
String redirect = Request["dest"];
Response.Redirect(redirect);
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.dotnet.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中所使用的 URL 有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站台內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生 Open Redirect 弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 JSP 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要始終檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙而點閱連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 JSP 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
dest
要求參數剖析的 URL。
...
final server = await HttpServer.bind(host, port);
await for (HttpRequest request in server) {
final response = request.response;
final headers = request.headers;
final strDest = headers.value('strDest');
response.headers.contentType = ContentType.text;
response.redirect(Uri.parse(strDest!));
await response.close();
}
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要始終檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙而點閱連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.dart.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中所使用的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站台內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至攻擊者可以控制的任意 URL 時,會發生 Open Redirect 弱點。
攻擊者可利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪受信任網站的 URL,然後將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例:當使用者按一下連結時,下列程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們造訪連結 "http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com",則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要始終檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目的地 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙造訪連結。
攻擊者可利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪受信任網站的 URL,然後將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例:當使用者按一下連結時,下列程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
dest
要求參數剖析的 URL。
...
strDest := r.Form.Get("dest")
http.Redirect(w, r, strDest, http.StatusSeeOther)
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們造訪連結 "http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com",則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至 "http://www.wilyhacker.com"。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要始終檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目的地 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙造訪連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.golang.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中所使用的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站台內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生 Open Redirect 弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 Spring WebFlow 流程狀態定義會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟由
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要始終檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙而點閱連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 Spring WebFlow 流程狀態定義會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟由
dest
要求參數所解析的 URL。
<end-state id="redirectView" view="externalRedirect:#{requestParameters.dest}" />
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要始終檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙而點閱連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.configuration.java.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站點內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,以下 JavaScript 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟由
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,以下 JavaScript 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟由
dest
要求參數所讀取的 URL。
...
strDest = form.dest.value;
window.open(strDest,"myresults");
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.javascript.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站點內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 PHP 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.php?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.php?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 PHP 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
dest
要求參數所解析的 URL。
<%
...
$strDest = $_GET["dest"];
header("Location: " . $strDest);
...
%>
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.php?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.php?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.php.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站台內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按下連結時,下列程序會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/pls/hr/showemps?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/pls/hr/showemps?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按下連結時,下列程序會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
dest
要求參數所解析的 URL。
...
-- Assume QUERY_STRING looks like dest=http://www.wilyhacker.com
dest := SUBSTR(OWA_UTIL.get_cgi_env('QUERY_STRING'), 6);
OWA_UTIL.redirect_url('dest');
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/pls/hr/showemps?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/pls/hr/showemps?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.sql.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站點內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 Python 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 Python 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
dest
要求參數所解析的 URL。
...
strDest = request.field("dest")
redirect(strDest)
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.python.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站點內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:以下 Ruby 程式碼指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:以下 Ruby 程式碼指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟
dest
要求參數所解析的 URL:
...
str_dest = req.params['dest']
...
res = Rack::Response.new
...
res.redirect("http://#{dest}")
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.ruby.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站台內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:以下 Play 控制項方法指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D」
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:以下 Play 控制項方法指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟從
dest
要求參數解析的 URL:
def myAction = Action { implicit request =>
...
request.getQueryString("dest") match {
case Some(location) => Redirect(location)
case None => Ok("No url found!")
}
...
}
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示他們開啟連結「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
「http://trusted.example.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D」
那麼,即使再有經驗的一般使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.scala.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站點內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可能遭攻擊者控制的任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:以下程式碼會處理使用應用程式自訂 URL 架構的任何要求,將
AppDelegate.swift:
ViewController.swift
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「custom_url_scheme://innocent_url?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,使用者可能會按下該連結,並認為會執行無害的動作。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"custom_url_scheme://innocent_url?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:以下程式碼會處理使用應用程式自訂 URL 架構的任何要求,將
requestToLoad
設定為指向原始 URL 的「dest」參數 (如果存在的話) 以及指向使用 http://
架構的原始 URL,最後在 WKWebView 內載入此要求:AppDelegate.swift:
...
let requestToLoad : String
...
func application(app: UIApplication, openURL url: NSURL, options: [String : AnyObject]) -> Bool {
...
if let urlComponents = NSURLComponents(URL: url, resolvingAgainstBaseURL: false) {
if let queryItems = urlComponents.queryItems as? [NSURLQueryItem]{
for queryItem in queryItems {
if queryItem.name == "dest" {
if let value = queryItem.value {
request = NSURLRequest(URL:NSURL(string:value))
requestToLoad = request
break
}
}
}
}
if requestToLoad == nil {
urlComponents.scheme = "http"
requestToLoad = NSURLRequest(URL:urlComponents.URL)
}
}
...
}
...
ViewController.swift
...
let webView : WKWebView
let appDelegate = UIApplication.sharedApplication().delegate as! AppDelegate
webView.loadRequest(appDelegate.requestToLoad)
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「custom_url_scheme://innocent_url?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,使用者可能會按下該連結,並認為會執行無害的動作。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼將會嘗試在 WKWebView 中要求並載入「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"custom_url_scheme://innocent_url?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[2] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[3] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[4] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.swift.open_redirect
Abstract
允許未經驗證的輸入控制重新導向中的 URL,有助於網路釣魚攻擊。
Explanation
重新導向會在相同 Web 應用程式中將使用者導引到不同的網頁,或導引到外部網站。應用程式會利用重新導向協助站點內的導覽,且在某些情況下,會追蹤使用者離開網站的方法。Web 應用程式將用戶端重新導向至可由攻擊控制的任何任意 URL 時,會發生開放式重新導向弱點。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 VB 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟由
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://www.trustedsite.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://www.trustedsite.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
攻擊者可能利用 Open Redirect 誘騙使用者造訪可信任網站的 URL,但接著會將其重新導向至惡意網站。透過對 URL 進行編碼,攻擊者可讓一般使用者難以注意到重新導向的惡意目標,即使將這個目標當作 URL 參數傳遞到受信任的網站也是如此。Open Redirect 通常為網路釣魚所使用的方法之一,可用來取得敏感的一般使用者資料。
範例 1:當使用者按一下連結時,下列 VB 程式碼會指示使用者的瀏覽器開啟由
dest
要求參數所解析的 URL。
...
strDest = Request.Form('dest')
HyperLink.NavigateTo strDest
...
如果受害者收到一封電子郵件,指示其開啟連結「http://www.trustedsite.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=www.wilyhacker.com」,則該使用者可能會按下此連結,並認為自己會前往一個可信任的網站。不過,當受害者按下連結時,
Example 1
中的程式碼會將瀏覽器重新導向至「http://www.wilyhacker.com」。許多使用者一直以來都被告知,要檢查在電子郵件中所接收到的 URL,以確定該連結是指向他們知悉的可信任網站。不過,如果攻擊者使用 Hex 以下列方式編碼目標的 URL:
"http://www.trustedsite.com/ecommerce/redirect.asp?dest=%77%69%6C%79%68%61%63%6B%65%72%2E%63%6F%6D"
那麼,即使再有經驗的終端使用者也可能會被誘騙進入以下連結。
References
[1] Phishers use IRS tax refund as bait CNet News
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 601
[3] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002754
[4] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[5] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SI-10 Information Input Validation (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SI-10 Information Input Validation
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 5.1.5 Input Validation Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M4 Insufficient Input/Output Validation
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A1 Unvalidated Input
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A10 Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.3.1.1
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.1
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.1
[21] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.1
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 4.2 - Critical Asset Protection, Control Objective B.3.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective B.3.1.1 - Terminal Software Attack Mitigation, Control Objective C.3.2 - Web Software Attack Mitigation
[26] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[27] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Insecure Interaction - CWE ID 601
[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[30] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[31] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3510 CAT I, APP3600 CAT II
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-002530 CAT II, APSC-DV-002560 CAT I
[50] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 URL Redirector Abuse (WASC-38)
[51] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Content Spoofing
desc.dataflow.vb.open_redirect