界: Security Features

軟體安全性並非安全性軟體。我們關注驗證、Access Control、保密性、加密以及權限管理之類的主題。

312 找到的項目

弱點

AWS Ansible Misconfiguration: RDS Publicly Accessible

YAML

Abstract

Ansible 工作將定義一個具有公開存取權的 Amazon RDS 執行個體。

Explanation

可公開存取的 Amazon RDS 執行個體不必要地擴大了組織的受攻擊面。開放與公眾互動的服務會受到攻擊者幾乎連續的掃描和探測。

範例 1：以下 Ansible 工作設定了一個具有公開存取權的 RDS 執行個體，因為 publicly_accessible 設定為 true。


- name: createdb
  community.aws.rds_instance:
    db_instance_identifier: test-db
    engine: aurora
    instance_type: db.t2.small
    username: "{{ username }}"
    password: "{{ password }}"
    cluster_id: test-cluster
    publicly_accessible: true

References

[1] Sloane Hertel (@s-hertel) community.aws.rds_instance – Manage RDS instances

[2] Amazon Web Services Security in Amazon RDS

[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4

[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial

[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3

[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1

[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality

[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark partial

[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 749

[10] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [25] CWE ID 862

[11] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [18] CWE ID 862

[12] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2022 [16] CWE ID 862

[13] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000213, CCI-001084, CCI-002165

[14] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation

[15] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-6 Least Privilege (P1)

[16] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-6 Least Privilege

[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A2 Broken Access Control

[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A4 Insecure Direct Object Reference

[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A4 Insecure Direct Object References

[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A4 Insecure Direct Object References

[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A5 Broken Access Control

[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control

[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration

[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 4.1.3 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3)

[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.2

[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.5.4

[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.8

[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.8

[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.8

[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.8

[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.8

[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 7.3.2

[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control

[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control

[35] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.3 - Web Software Access Controls

[36] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2009 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 285

[37] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 863

[38] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 863

[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3480.1 CAT II

[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3480.1 CAT I

[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3480.1 CAT I

[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3480.1 CAT I

[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3480.1 CAT I

[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3480.1 CAT I

[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3480.1 CAT I

[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[59] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Insufficient Authorization (WASC-02)

[60] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Insufficient Authorization

desc.structural.yaml.aws_ansible_misconfiguration_rds_publicly_accessible.base

AWS CloudFormation Misconfiguration: Improper EC2 Network Access Control

JSON
YAML

Abstract

範本定義一個存取權限制不足的 SecurityGroup。

Explanation

寬鬆的存取組態會將系統不必要地暴露在外，並擴大組織的受攻擊面。開放與公眾互動的服務會受到惡意實體幾乎連續的掃描和探測。

在發現並發佈針對公開服務的零時差攻擊 (例如 Heartbleed) 時問題特別大。攻擊者可主動追蹤和搜尋未修補和暴露的系統以進行攻擊。


"PSQLSecurityGroup": {
    "Type": "AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup",
    "Properties": {
        "VpcId": {
            "Ref": "VpcId"
        },
        "GroupDescription": "Enable PSQL access via port 5432 to world",
        "SecurityGroupIngress": [
            {
                "CidrIp": "0.0.0.0/0",
                "FromPort": 5432,
                "IpProtocol": "tcp",
                "ToPort": 5432
            }
        ]
    }

References

[1] Amazon Web Services AWS Documentation: AWS::EC2::SecurityGroupIngress

[2] Jesse Lepich and Michael Ingoldby AWS Security Blog: How to continuously audit and limit security groups with AWS Firewall Manager

[3] Jeffrey Lyon AWS Security Blog: How to Help Prepare for DDoS Attacks by Reducing Your Attack Surface

[4] Josh Fruhlinger CSO: What is the Heartbleed bug, how does it work and how was it fixed?

[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2

[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2

[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1

[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality

[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 749

[10] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [18] CWE ID 522