Reino: Encapsulation

La encapsulación consiste en crear límites fuertes. En un explorador web esto puede suponer la seguridad de que tu codificación móvil no se vea comprometido por otro código móvil. En el servidor puede significar la diferenciación entre los datos validados y los que no lo están, entre los datos de un usuario y los de otro, o entre los diferentes usuarios, los datos que pueden ver y los que no.

104 elementos encontrados

Debilidades

.NET Bad Practices: Leftover Debug Code

C#/VB.NET/ASP.NET

Abstract

El código de depuración puede tener efectos adversos no deseados en la implementación.

Explanation

Solo se utilizan API destinadas a fines de depuración.

References

[1] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 1

[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4

[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1

[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark normal

[5] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 489

[6] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data

[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A6 Information Leakage and Improper Error Handling

[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A05 Security Misconfiguration

[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 14.2.2 Dependency (L1 L2 L3), 14.3.2 Unintended Security Disclosure Requirements (L1 L2 L3)

[10] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 6.5.10

[11] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 6.5.6

[12] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.5

[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.5

[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.5

[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.5

[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.5

[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4

[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 3.6 - Sensitive Data Retention

[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 3.6 - Sensitive Data Retention

[20] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 3.6 - Sensitive Data Retention

[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3620 CAT II

[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3620 CAT II

[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3620 CAT II

[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3620 CAT II

[25] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3620 CAT II

[26] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3620 CAT II

[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3620 CAT II

desc.structural.dotnet.dotnet_bad_practices_leftover_debug_code

ADF Bad Practices: Default url-invoke-disallowed Setting

Java/JSP

Abstract

Depender de una configuración implícita predeterminada url-invoke-disallowed carece de claridad y puede provocar un comportamiento no deseado si el valor predeterminado cambia inesperadamente.

Explanation

De forma predeterminada, los flujos de tareas en una aplicación Fusion no son directamente accesibles desde una solicitud GET: cada vez que una URL intenta invocar el flujo de tareas, recibe un código de estado HTTP 403. Sin embargo, confiar en una configuración implícita siempre carece de claridad y puede conducir a comportamientos no deseados si la configuración predeterminada cambia de forma inesperada.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente fragmento de un archivo de definición de flujo de tarea muestra un ejemplo de flujo de tarea configurado con el ajuste implícito predeterminado url-invoke-disallowed.


...
    <task-flow-definition id="password">
        <default-activity>PasswordPrompt</default-activity>
        <view id="PasswordPrompt">
            <page>/PasswordPrompt.jsff</page>
        </view>
        <use-page-fragments/>
    </task-flow-definition>
...

References

[1] Oracle(R) Fusion Middleware Fusion Developer's Guide for Oracle Application Development Framework, 15.6.4.How to Call a Bounded Task Flow Using a URL

[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2

[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4

[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1

[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark normal

[6] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000213, CCI-001084, CCI-002165

[7] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM

[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-3 Access Enforcement (P1)

[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-3 Access Enforcement

[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management

[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A5 Security Misconfiguration

[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration

[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A05 Security Misconfiguration

[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M1 Weak Server Side Controls

[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M8 Security Misconfiguration

[16] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[17] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[25] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[26] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[27] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[28] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[29] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II

[30] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)

desc.config.java.adf_bad_practices_default_url_invoke_disallowed_setting

Android Bad Practices: Encryption Secret Held in Static Field

Java/JSP

Abstract

La aplicación almacena las clave de cifrado en campos de clase estáticos, lo que permite que los atacantes las puedan obtener con facilidad.

Explanation

El almacenamiento de claves de cifrado en campos de clase estáticos permite que estas se puedan obtener con facilidad por parte de entidades con acceso a la memoria de procesamiento (por ejemplo, un dispositivo con acceso root) o a los volcados de memoria de procesamiento (por ejemplo, los volcados de memoria).

References

[1] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3

[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark complete

[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4.1

[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1

[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark integrity

[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark partial

[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 226

[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2019 [4] CWE ID 200

[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [7] CWE ID 200

[10] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [20] CWE ID 200

[11] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001090, CCI-001199

[12] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 IA

[13] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data

[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement (P1), SC-4 Information in Shared Resources (P1)

[15] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement, SC-4 Information in Shared System Resources

[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage

[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage

[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage

[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure

[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure

[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A04 Insecure Design

[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 8.3.4 Sensitive Private Data (L1 L2 L3), 8.3.6 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3)

[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M4 Unintended Data Leakage

[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M10 Insufficient Cryptography

[25] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-STORAGE-2

[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 3.4, Requirement 6.5.8, Requirement 8.4

[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 3.4, Requirement 6.3.1.3, Requirement 6.5.8, Requirement 8.4

[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 3.4, Requirement 6.5.3, Requirement 8.4

[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 3.4, Requirement 6.5.3, Requirement 8.2.1

[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 3.4, Requirement 6.5.3, Requirement 8.2.1

[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 3.4, Requirement 6.5.3, Requirement 8.2.1

[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 3.4, Requirement 6.5.3, Requirement 8.2.1

[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 3.5.1, Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 8.3.1

[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.2 - Use of Cryptography

[35] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.2 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design

[36] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.2 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design

[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3230.2 CAT II

[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3230.2 CAT II

[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3230.2 CAT II

[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3230.2 CAT II

[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3230.2 CAT II

[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3230.2 CAT II

[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3230.2 CAT II

[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-002330 CAT II, APSC-DV-002380 CAT II

[58] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)

[59] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Information Leakage

desc.structural.java.android_bad_practices_encryption_secret_held_in_static_field

Android Bad Practices: Leftover Debug Code

Java/JSP

Abstract

El código de depuración puede afectar al rendimiento o filtrar información confidencial a un atacante.

Explanation

Un procedimiento habitual de desarrollo consiste en añadir un código de "puerta trasera" diseñado específicamente para fines de depuración o pruebas que no se vaya a enviar o implementar con la aplicación. Cuando este tipo de código de depuración se deja accidentalmente en la aplicación, este se abre en modos de interacción no previstos. Estos puntos de entrada de "puerta trasera" conllevan riesgos de seguridad porque no se tienen en cuenta durante las fases de diseño y pruebas, y no se incluyen en las condiciones de funcionamiento previstas de la aplicación.