Reino: Encapsulation

Encapsulamento consiste em traçar limites fortes. Em um navegador web, isso pode significar que seu código para dispositivos móveis não pode ser abusado por outros códigos para dispositivos móveis. No servidor, pode significar a diferenciação entre dados validados e não validados, entre os dados de dois usuários ou entre os dados que os usuários podem ou não acessar.

104 itens encontrados
Vulnerabilidades
Abstract
O modelo define uma instância do Amazon RDS sem criptografia.
Explanation
Por padrão, as instâncias do Amazon RDS não são criptografadas. Isso expõe os dados a um possível roubo e acesso não autorizado.


"Resources": {
"RDSDBExample": {
"Type": "AWS::RDS::DBInstance",
"Properties": {
"StorageEncrypted": false,
"DBName": "Test DB",
"DBInstanceClass": "db.m4.large"
}
}
}
References
[1] Amazon Web Services Encrypting Amazon RDS resources
[2] Amazon Web Services Security in Amazon RDS
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[10] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[11] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[12] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_rds_storage.base
Abstract
O modelo define uma instância do Amazon RDS sem criptografia.
Explanation
Por padrão, as instâncias do Amazon RDS não são criptografadas. Isso expõe os dados a um possível roubo e acesso não autorizado.
References
[1] Ansible project contributors community.aws.rds_instance – Manage RDS instances
[2] Amazon Web Services Encrypting Amazon RDS resources
[3] Amazon Web Services Security in Amazon RDS
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 5
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[9] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[10] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[11] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[12] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[13] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[15] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_rds_storage.base
Abstract
O modelo define um cluster Amazon Redshift sem criptografia.
Explanation
Por padrão, os clusters do Amazon Redshift não são criptografados. Isso expõe os dados a acesso não autorizado e possível roubo.

Exemplo 1: O modelo a seguir define um cluster Redshift sem criptografia habilitada.

"Resources": {
"RedshiftClusterTest": {
"Type": "AWS::Redshift::Cluster",
"Properties": {
"DBName": "mydb",
"MasterUsername": "master",
"MasterUserPassword": "masterPass",
"NodeType": "ds2.xlarge",
"ClusterType": "single-node",
}
}
References
[1] Amazon Web Services Amazon Redshift database encryption
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_redshift_storage.base
Abstract
O modelo define um cluster Amazon Redshift sem criptografia.
Explanation
Por padrão, os clusters do Amazon Redshift não são criptografados. Isso expõe os dados a acesso não autorizado e possível roubo.
References
[1] Ansible project contributors community.aws.redshift – create, delete, or modify an Amazon Redshift instance
[2] Amazon Web Services Amazon Redshift database encryption
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark partial
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[10] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[11] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[12] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[32] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_ansible_misconfiguration_insecure_redshift_storage.base
Abstract
O bucket do Amazon S3 é criado sem habilitar a criptografia em repouso por padrão.
Explanation
Um bucket do Amazon S3 é criado sem criptografia no lado do servidor. A criptografia atenua as violações de dados tornando os dados ilegíveis para qualquer pessoa sem as credenciais adequadas. Como tal, a criptografia em repouso é uma medida para atender a alguns requisitos de conformidade industrial e governamental, como GDPR, HIPAA e PCI.
References
[1] GDPR Article 32 European Parliament and Council of the European Union
[2] HIPAA Security Rule U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
[3] Amazon Simple Storage Service User Guide Amazon Web Services, Inc.
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[10] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001350, CCI-002475
[11] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[12] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.2 - Use of Cryptography
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13), Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_s3_bucket_storage.base
Abstract
Um bucket do Amazon S3 é criado sem habilitar a criptografia em repouso.
Explanation
Um bucket do Amazon S3 é criado sem criptografia no lado do servidor. A criptografia atenua as violações de dados tornando os dados ilegíveis para qualquer pessoa sem as credenciais adequadas. A criptografia em repouso pode ajudar a atender alguns requisitos de conformidade industrial e governamental, como GDPR, HIPAA e PCI.
References
[1] GDPR Article 32 European Parliament and Council of the European Union
[2] Manage S3 buckets in AWS Ansible project contributors
[3] Amazon Simple Storage Service User Guide Amazon Web Services, Inc.
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark confidentiality
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[10] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001350, CCI-002475
[11] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[12] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[14] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M2 Insecure Data Storage
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.2 - Use of Cryptography
[33] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[34] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13), Application Misconfiguration (WASC-15)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_s3_bucket_storage.base
Abstract
O modelo define um tópico SNS não criptografado.
Explanation
Por padrão, os tópicos SNS não são criptografados em repouso. Isso expõe, possivelmente, os dados a visualizadores não autorizados.

Exemplo 1: O modelo de exemplo a seguir falha ao criptografar o tópico SNS ao negligenciar a definição de um identificador de chave AWS KMS.

{
"AWSTemplateFormatVersion": "2010-09-09",
"Description": "My SNS topic",
"Resources": {
"MySNSTopic": {
"Type": "AWS::SNS::Topic",
"Properties": {
"Subscription": [
{
"Endpoint": "MySNSEndpoint",
"Protocol": "sqs"
}
],
"TopicName": "MyTopic"
}
}
}
}
References
[1] Michelle Mercier and Otavio Ferreira AWS Compute Blog: Encrypting messages published to Amazon SNS with AWS KMS
[2] AWS Documentation AWS SNS - Encryption at rest
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark Confidentiality
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3500 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.json.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_sns_topic_storage.base
Abstract
O modelo define um tópico SNS não criptografado.
Explanation
Por padrão, os tópicos SNS não são criptografados em repouso. Isso expõe, possivelmente, os dados a visualizadores não autorizados.

Exemplo 1: O exemplo a seguir mostra um modelo que falha ao criptografar o tópico SNS por negligenciar a definição de um identificador de chave AWS KMS.


AWSTemplateFormatVersion: 2010-09-09
Description: My SNS Topic
Resources:
MySNSTopic:
Type: AWS::SNS::Topic
Properties:
Subscription:
- Endpoint: "MySNSEndpoint"
Protocol: "sqs"
TopicName: "SampleTopic"
References
[1] Michelle Mercier and Otavio Ferreira AWS Compute Blog: Encrypting messages published to Amazon SNS with AWS KMS
[2] AWS Documentation AWS SNS - Encryption at rest
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 2
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark Confidentiality
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Kubernetes Benchmark complete
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[9] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-002475
[10] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[11] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[12] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[13] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A8 Insecure Storage
[15] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A8 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[16] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A7 Insecure Cryptographic Storage
[17] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2013 A6 Sensitive Data Exposure
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[22] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 6.5.3
[23] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 6.5.3
[24] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[25] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 6.3 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[30] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[31] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[32] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3310 CAT I, APP3340 CAT I
[33] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3500 CAT II
[34] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[35] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[36] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[37] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[38] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3210.1 CAT II, APP3340 CAT I
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.structural.yaml.aws_cloudformation_misconfiguration_insecure_sns_topic_storage.base
Abstract
O aplicativo usa a ID de toque para armazenar um item no conjunto de chaves, mas não consegue restringir as impressões digitais válidas àquelas disponíveis quando o item de conjunto de chaves foi armazenado.
Explanation
A autenticação baseada em ID de toque pode ser implementada usando os serviços de conjunto de chaves armazenando um item no conjunto de chaves e definindo um controle de acesso que requer que o usuário use sua impressão digital para recuperar o item posteriormente. As seguintes políticas podem ser usadas para definir como o usuário será autenticado usando sua impressão digital:

- kSecAccessControlUserPresence: Restrição para acessar usando a ID de toque ou a senha. A ID de toque não precisa estar disponível ou registrada. O item ainda estará acessível pela ID de toque, mesmo se as impressões digitais forem adicionadas ou removidas.
- kSecAccessControlTouchIDAny: Restrição para acessar usando a ID de toque para quaisquer impressões digitais registradas. O item não será invalidado se as impressões digitais forem adicionadas ou removidas.
- kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet: Restrição para acessar usando a ID de toque para as impressões digitais registradas no momento. O item será invalidado se as impressões digitais forem adicionadas ou removidas.

Ao usar a ID de toque, você deve usar o atributo kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet para proteger contra a adição ou remoção de impressões digitais no futuro.

Exemplo 1: O seguinte código usa a restrição kSecAccessControlTouchIDAny que permite que todas as impressões digitais cadastradas no futuro desbloqueiem o item de conjunto de chaves:


...
SecAccessControlRef sacRef = SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags(kCFAllocatorDefault,
kSecAttrAccessibleWhenPasscodeSetThisDeviceOnly,
kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet,
nil);
NSMutableDictionary *dict = [NSMutableDictionary dictionary];
[dict setObject:(__bridge id)kSecClassGenericPassword forKey:(__bridge id) kSecClass];
[dict setObject:account forKey:(__bridge id)kSecAttrAccount];
[dict setObject:service forKey:(__bridge id) kSecAttrService];
[dict setObject:token forKey:(__bridge id)kSecValueData];
...
[dict setObject:sacRef forKey:(__bridge id)kSecAttrAccessControl];
[dict setObject:@"Please authenticate using the Touch ID sensor." forKey:(__bridge id)kSecUseOperationPrompt];

dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0), ^{
OSStatus status = SecItemAdd((__bridge CFDictionaryRef)dict, nil);
});
...
References
[1] David Thiel iOS Application Security: The Definitive Guide for Hackers and Developers No Starch Press
[2] Integrating Touch ID Into Your iOS Applications Cigital
[3] Don't Touch Me That Way nVisium
[4] SecAccessControlCreateFlags Apple
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 3
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark normal
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 287
[10] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2019 [13] CWE ID 287
[11] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [14] CWE ID 287
[12] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [14] CWE ID 287
[13] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2022 [14] CWE ID 287
[14] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2023 [13] CWE ID 287
[15] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001958
[16] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM, SC
[17] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A9 Insecure Communications
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A9 Insufficient Transport Layer Protection
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A07 Identification and Authentication Failures
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.7.1 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.2 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.3 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.8.4 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.5 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 3.7.1 Defenses Against Session Management Exploits (L1 L2 L3), 9.2.3 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M5 Poor Authorization and Authentication
[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M3 Insecure Authentication/Authorization
[25] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-AUTH-1, MASVS-AUTH-2
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.10
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.3.1.4, Requirement 6.5.9
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control
[35] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control
[36] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.1.2 - Web Software Access Controls
[37] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[38] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[59] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[60] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Insufficient Authentication (WASC-01)
[61] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Insufficient Authentication
desc.dataflow.objc.biometric_authentication_insufficient_touch_id_protection
Abstract
O aplicativo usa a ID de toque para armazenar um item no conjunto de chaves, mas não consegue restringir as impressões digitais válidas àquelas disponíveis quando o item de conjunto de chaves foi armazenado.
Explanation
A autenticação baseada em ID de toque pode ser implementada usando os serviços de conjunto de chaves armazenando um item no conjunto de chaves e definindo um controle de acesso que requer que o usuário use sua impressão digital para recuperar o item posteriormente. As seguintes políticas podem ser usadas para definir como o usuário será autenticado usando sua impressão digital:

- kSecAccessControlUserPresence: Restrição para acessar usando a ID de toque ou a senha. A ID de toque não precisa estar disponível ou registrada. O item ainda estará acessível pela ID de toque, mesmo se as impressões digitais forem adicionadas ou removidas.
- kSecAccessControlTouchIDAny: Restrição para acessar usando a ID de toque para quaisquer impressões digitais registradas. O item não será invalidado se as impressões digitais forem adicionadas ou removidas.
- kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet: Restrição para acessar usando a ID de toque para as impressões digitais registradas no momento. O item será invalidado se as impressões digitais forem adicionadas ou removidas.

Ao usar a ID de toque, você deve usar o atributo kSecAccessControlTouchIDCurrentSet para proteger contra a adição ou remoção de impressões digitais no futuro.

Exemplo 1: O seguinte código usa a restrição kSecAccessControlTouchIDAny que permite que todas as impressões digitais cadastradas no futuro desbloqueiem o item de conjunto de chaves:


...
let flags = SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags(kCFAllocatorDefault,
kSecAttrAccessibleWhenPasscodeSetThisDeviceOnly,
.TouchIDAny,
nil)

var query = [String : AnyObject]()
query[kSecClass as String] = kSecClassGenericPassword
query[kSecAttrService as String] = service as AnyObject?
query[kSecAttrAccount as String] = account as AnyObject?
query[kSecValueData as String] = secret as AnyObject?
...
query[kSecAttrAccessControl as String] = sacRef
query[kSecUseOperationPrompt as String] = "Please authenticate using the Touch ID sensor."

SecItemAdd(query as CFDictionary, nil)
...
References
[1] David Thiel iOS Application Security: The Definitive Guide for Hackers and Developers No Starch Press
[2] Integrating Touch ID Into Your iOS Applications Cigital
[3] Don't Touch Me That Way nVisium
[4] SecAccessControlCreateFlags Apple
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 1
[6] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 4
[7] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 3
[8] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark normal
[9] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 287
[10] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2019 [13] CWE ID 287
[11] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [14] CWE ID 287
[12] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [14] CWE ID 287
[13] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2022 [14] CWE ID 287
[14] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2023 [13] CWE ID 287
[15] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001958
[16] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM, SC
[17] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[18] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2004 A10 Insecure Configuration Management
[19] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2007 A9 Insecure Communications
[20] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2010 A9 Insufficient Transport Layer Protection
[21] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A07 Identification and Authentication Failures
[22] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.7.1 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.2 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.3 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.8.4 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.5 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 3.7.1 Defenses Against Session Management Exploits (L1 L2 L3), 9.2.3 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3)
[23] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2014 M5 Poor Authorization and Authentication
[24] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile 2024 M3 Insecure Authentication/Authorization
[25] Standards Mapping - OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard 2.0 MASVS-AUTH-1, MASVS-AUTH-2
[26] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.10
[27] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 1.2 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.3.1.4, Requirement 6.5.9
[28] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 2.0 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[29] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.0 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[30] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[31] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[32] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[33] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[34] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control
[35] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control
[36] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.3 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.1.2 - Web Software Access Controls
[37] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2010 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[38] Standards Mapping - SANS Top 25 2011 Porous Defenses - CWE ID 311
[39] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[40] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[41] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[42] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[43] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[44] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[45] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3250.1 CAT I, APP3250.2 CAT I, APP3250.3 CAT II, APP3250.4 CAT II
[46] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.1 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[47] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.2 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[48] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.3 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[49] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.4 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[50] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.5 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[51] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.6 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[52] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.7 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[53] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.8 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[54] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.9 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[55] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.10 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[56] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[57] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[58] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[59] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-001650 CAT II
[60] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Insufficient Authentication (WASC-01)
[61] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium 24 + 2 Insufficient Authentication
desc.dataflow.swift.biometric_authentication_insufficient_touch_id_protection
Abstract
A tag <cfdump> pode deixar vazar informações confidenciais em um aplicativo da Web implantado.
Explanation
É prática comum processar a saída dos valores de variáveis para fins depuração ou teste com um código que não se destina a ser distribuído ou permanecer ativo no aplicativo implantado. Quando esse tipo de código de depuração é acidentalmente deixado no aplicativo, este pode fornecer informações para um invasor de maneiras inesperadas. Nem todas as instruções de depuração deixam vazar informações confidenciais ou privadas. No entanto, a presença de uma instrução de depuração muitas vezes indica que o código circundante foi negligenciado e pode estar em mau estado de conservação.

O exemplo mais comum de código de depuração esquecido no ColdFusion é a tag <cfdump>. Embora o uso de <cfdump> seja aceitável durante o desenvolvimento do produto, os desenvolvedores responsáveis pelo código que faz parte de um aplicativo Web de produção deve considerar cuidadosamente se qualquer uso da tag <cfdump> deve ser permitido.
References
[1] Standards Mapping - CIS Azure Kubernetes Service Benchmark 1
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service Benchmark 3
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Amazon Web Services Foundations Benchmark 1
[4] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark normal
[5] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 215
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2019 [4] CWE ID 200
[7] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2020 [7] CWE ID 200
[8] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration Top 25 2021 [20] CWE ID 200
[9] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SI
[10] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A05 Security Misconfiguration
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 8.3.4 Sensitive Private Data (L1 L2 L3), 14.3.2 Unintended Security Disclosure Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 3.6 - Sensitive Data Retention
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 3.6 - Sensitive Data Retention
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 3.6 - Sensitive Data Retention
[16] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.1 APP3120 CAT II
[17] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.4 APP3120 CAT II
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.5 APP3120 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.6 APP3120 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.7 APP3120 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.9 APP3120 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 3.10 APP3120 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Web Application Security Consortium Version 2.00 Information Leakage (WASC-13)
desc.semantic.cfml.coldfusion_badpractices_leftover_debug_code
Abstract
A falha em restringir a inclusão de um aplicativo em um iframe pode levar a ataques de solicitação intersite forjada ou de phishing.
Explanation
As vulnerabilidades de script entre estruturas ocorrem quando um aplicativo:

1. Permite a própria inclusão em um iframe.
2. Falha em especificar a política de estruturação por meio do cabeçalho X-Frame-Options.
3. Usa proteção fraca, como a lógica de redução de estrutura baseada em JavaScript.

Vulnerabilidades de geração de scripts entre quadros muitas vezes formam a base de explorações do tipo clickjacking, que os invasores podem usar para conduzir uma falsificação de solicitações entre sites ou ataques de phishing.
References
[1] OWASP Cross Frame Scripting
[2] OWASP Clickjacking
[3] OWASP Clickjacking Defense Cheat Sheet
[4] Node.js Security Checklist
desc.dataflow.javascript.cross_frame_scripting
Abstract
A falha em restringir a inclusão de um aplicativo em um iframe pode levar a ataques de solicitação intersite forjada ou de phishing.
Explanation
As vulnerabilidades de script entre estruturas ocorrem quando um aplicativo:

1. Permite a própria inclusão em um iframe.
2. Falha em especificar a política de estruturação por meio do cabeçalho X-Frame-Options.
3. Usa proteção fraca, como a lógica de redução de estrutura baseada em JavaScript.

Vulnerabilidades de geração de scripts entre quadros muitas vezes formam a base de explorações do tipo clickjacking, que os invasores podem usar para conduzir uma falsificação de solicitações entre sites ou ataques de phishing.
References
[1] OWASP Cross Frame Scripting
[2] OWASP Clickjacking
[3] OWASP Clickjacking Defense Cheat Sheet
[4] Clickjacking Protection
desc.structural.python.cross_frame_scripting