1437 elementos encontrados
Debilidades
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform establece una App Engine sin aplicar SSL en todas las conexiones.
Explanation
Por defecto, una aplicación App Engine acepta conexiones no cifradas y no seguras. Esto expone los datos a accesos no autorizados, posibles robos y manipulaciones.
References
[1] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark Recommendation 4.10
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[3] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000068, CCI-001453, CCI-002418, CCI-002420, CCI-002421, CCI-002422, CCI-002890, CCI-003123
[4] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SC
[5] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-17 Remote Access (P1), MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance (P2), SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-17 Remote Access, MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance, SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 3.7.1 Defenses Against Session Management Exploits (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.1 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.2.1 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3), 9.2.3 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3)
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[12] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design, Control Objective C.4.1 - Web Software Communications
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_insecure_app_engine_transport
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform permite las solicitudes HTTP no seguras para desencadenar una función en la nube.
Explanation
Por defecto, un desencadenador HTTP permite que una función en la nube se ejecute únicamente en respuesta a solicitudes HTTPS. Al permitir las solicitudes HTTP no seguras se exponen los datos a accesos no autorizados, posibles robos y manipulaciones.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo muestra una configuración de Terraform que define un desencadenador HTTP que no aplica puntos finales HTTPS configurando https_trigger_security_level en SECURE_OPTIONAL.

resource "google_cloudfunctions_function" "demo_function" {
...
trigger_http = true
https_trigger_security_level = "SECURE_OPTIONAL"
...
}
References
[1] HashiCorp google_cloudfunctions_function
[2] Google Cloud HTTP triggers
[3] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[4] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000068, CCI-001453, CCI-002418, CCI-002420, CCI-002421, CCI-002422, CCI-002890, CCI-003123
[5] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SC
[6] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-17 Remote Access (P1), MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance (P2), SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity (P1)
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-17 Remote Access, MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance, SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 3.7.1 Defenses Against Session Management Exploits (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.1 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.2.1 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3), 9.2.3 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3)
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design, Control Objective C.4.1 - Web Software Communications
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_insecure_cloud_function_http_trigger_transport
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform establece una instancia de base de datos sin aplicar SSL en todas las conexiones.
Explanation
De manera predeterminada, una instancia de Cloud SQL acepta conexiones no cifradas y no seguras. Esto expone los datos a accesos no autorizados, posibles robos y manipulaciones.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo muestra una configuración de Terraform que no requiere una instancia de base de datos para aplicar SSL en todas las conexiones configurando require_ssl en false.

resource "google_sql_database_instance" "database_instance_demo" {
...
settings {
ip_configuration {
require_ssl = false
...
}
...
}
}
References
[1] HashiCorp google_sql_database_instance
[2] Google Cloud Enforce SSL/TLS encryption
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark Recommendation 6.4
[4] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[5] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000068, CCI-001453, CCI-002418, CCI-002420, CCI-002421, CCI-002422, CCI-002890, CCI-003123
[6] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SC
[7] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-17 Remote Access (P1), MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance (P2), SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity (P1)
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-17 Remote Access, MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance, SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.7.1 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.2 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.7.3 Out of Band Verifier Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 2.8.4 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.8.5 Single or Multi Factor One Time Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 3.7.1 Defenses Against Session Management Exploits (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.1 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.2.1 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3), 9.2.3 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3)
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design, Control Objective C.4.1 - Web Software Communications
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_insecure_cloud_sql_transport
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform permite a los clientes conectarse a un servicio de Edge Cache mediante HTTP o HTTPS.
Explanation
Por defecto, un servicio Edge Cache acepta conexiones no cifradas y no seguras. Esto expone los datos a accesos no autorizados, posibles robos y manipulaciones.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo muestra una configuración de Terraform que define un servicio Edge Cache que no requiere que los clientes usen TLS para la comunicación configurando require_tls en false.

resource "google_network_services_edge_cache_service" "srv_demo" {
...
require_tls = false
...
}
References
[1] HashiCorp google_network_services_edge_cache_service
[2] Google Cloud Redirect all requests to HTTPS
[3] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[4] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000068, CCI-001453, CCI-002418, CCI-002420, CCI-002421, CCI-002422, CCI-002890, CCI-003123
[5] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SC
[6] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-17 Remote Access (P1), MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance (P2), SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity (P1)
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-17 Remote Access, MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance, SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 3.7.1 Defenses Against Session Management Exploits (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.1 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.2.1 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3), 9.2.3 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3)
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design, Control Objective C.4.1 - Web Software Communications
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_insecure_edge_cache_service_transport
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform permite políticas SSL con conjuntos de cifrado débiles para balanceadores de carga de proxy.
Explanation
El protocolo Seguridad de la capa de transporte (TLS) y el protocolo Capa de sockets seguros (SSL) ofrecen un mecanismo de protección para garantizar la autenticidad, la confidencialidad y la integridad de los datos transmitidos entre un cliente y el servidor web. Los protocolos TLS y SSL han sufrido varias revisiones que dan como resultado actualizaciones periódicas de versión. Cada nueva revisión aborda las deficiencias de seguridad halladas en la versión previa. El uso de versiones de los protocolos TLS/SSL inseguras debilita la protección de los datos y podría permitir a un atacante poner en peligro, robar o modificar información confidencial.

Los protocolos TLS/SSL débiles se caracterizan por alguna o todas las propiedades siguientes:

- No protegen ante los ataques "man-in-the-middle"
- Se usa la misma clave para autenticación y cifrado
- Débil control de autenticación de mensajes
- No protegen ante el cierre de conexión TCP

La presencia de estas propiedades puede permitir que un atacante intercepte, modifique o manipule datos confidenciales.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo de configuración de Terraform define una política SSL que permite que el equilibrador de carga del proxy permita el uso de conjuntos de cifrado SSL débiles configurando profile en COMPATIBLE.

resource "google_compute_ssl_policy" "policy-demo" {
...
profile = "COMPATIBLE"
...
}
Ejemplo 2: El siguiente ejemplo de configuración de Terraform define una política SSL personalizada, que permite específicamente que el equilibrador de carga del proxy permita el uso de un conjunto de cifrado SSL débil denominado TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA.

resource "google_compute_ssl_policy" "policy-demo" {
...
profile = "CUSTOM"
min_tls_version = "TLS_1_2"
custom_features = ["TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256", "TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256", "TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA"]
...
}
References
[1] HashiCorp google_compute_ssl_policy
[2] Google Cloud SSL policies overview
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark Recommendation 3.9
[4] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[5] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000068, CCI-000382, CCI-001453, CCI-001941, CCI-001942, CCI-002418, CCI-002420, CCI-002421, CCI-002422, CCI-002890, CCI-003123
[6] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM, SC
[7] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-17 Remote Access (P1), CM-7 Least Functionality (P1), IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users) (P1), MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance (P2), SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity (P1)
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-17 Remote Access, CM-7 Least Functionality, IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users), MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance, SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 2.9.3 Cryptographic Software and Devices Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3), 8.3.7 Sensitive Private Data (L2 L3), 9.1.2 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.3 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3)
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.3 - Terminal Software Design, Control Objective C.4.1 - Web Software Communications
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001510 CAT II, APSC-DV-001620 CAT II, APSC-DV-001630 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001510 CAT II, APSC-DV-001620 CAT II, APSC-DV-001630 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001510 CAT II, APSC-DV-001620 CAT II, APSC-DV-001630 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001510 CAT II, APSC-DV-001620 CAT II, APSC-DV-001630 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001510 CAT II, APSC-DV-001620 CAT II, APSC-DV-001630 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_insecure_load_balancer_transport
Abstract
La plantilla define un servicio con registros de auditoría insuficientes.
Explanation
La ausencia de registros de auditoría limita la capacidad de detectar y responder a incidentes relacionados con la seguridad e impide la investigación forense.

Los valores de configuración que socavan las capacidades de registro incluyen, entre otros:
- deshabilitar deliberadamente el registro de auditoría
- excluir acciones de usuarios, grupos o procesos específicos del registro
- proteger inadecuadamente la integridad del registro
- no habilitar el registro de auditoría opcional
- reducir la frecuencia de muestreo del registro
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark Recommendation 2.16
[3] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[4] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000166, CCI-000172
[5] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-2 Account Management (P1), AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-2 Account Management, AU-10 Non-Repudiation, AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[12] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
La plantilla define un servicio con registros de auditoría insuficientes.
Explanation
La ausencia de registros de auditoría limita la capacidad de detectar y responder a incidentes relacionados con la seguridad e impide la investigación forense.

Los valores de configuración que socavan las capacidades de registro incluyen, entre otros:
- deshabilitar deliberadamente el registro de auditoría
- excluir acciones de usuarios, grupos o procesos específicos del registro
- proteger inadecuadamente la integridad del registro
- no habilitar el registro de auditoría opcional
- reducir la frecuencia de muestreo del registro
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[3] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000166, CCI-000172
[4] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-2 Account Management (P1), AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-2 Account Management, AU-10 Non-Repudiation, AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[11] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[12] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[17] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform crea un depósito de almacenamiento en la nube sin habilitar los registros de uso y almacenamiento.
Explanation
Una configuración de Terraform crea un depósito de almacenamiento en la nube sin habilitar los registros de uso y almacenamiento. Estos registros contienen datos valiosos para el monitoreo de la red, análisis forense, análisis de seguridad en tiempo real y optimización de gastos.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo muestra una configuración de Terraform que crea un depósito de almacenamiento en la nube sin habilitar el uso y el registro de almacenamiento porque falta el argumento log_bucket.

resource "google_storage_bucket" "bucket-demo" {
name = "name-demo"
location = "US"
}
References
[1] HashiCorp google_storage_bucket
[2] Google Cloud Usage logs & storage logs
[3] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[4] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[5] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[6] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_insufficient_cloud_storage_bucket_logging
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform inhabilita el servicio de registro de un clúster de Google Kubernetes Engine.
Explanation
De forma predeterminada, un clúster de Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) escribe registros en Stackdriver Kubernetes Engine Logging Service. La configuración de Terraform configura un clúster de GKE y deshabilita explícitamente el servicio de registro. Los registros contienen datos valiosos que se utilizan para identificar incidentes de seguridad, supervisar infracciones de directivas y ayudar con los controles de no repudio.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo muestra una configuración de Terraform que inhabilita el servicio de registro de un clúster de GKE configurando logging_service en none.

resource "google_container_cluster" "cluster-demo" {
name = "name-demo"
location = "us-central1-a"
logging_service = "none"
...
}
References
[1] HashiCorp google_container_cluster
[2] Google Cloud Configuring Cloud Operations for GKE
[3] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[4] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[5] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[6] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_insufficient_gke_cluster_logging
Abstract
Un script de Terraform inhabilita el servicio de monitoreo de un clúster de Google Kubernetes Engine.
Explanation
De manera predeterminada, un clúster de Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) envía métricas desde pods al servicio de monitoreo de Stackdriver Kubernetes Engine. El script de Terraform configura un clúster de GKE y deshabilita explícitamente el servicio de monitoreo. La ausencia de métricas socava la detección adecuada y la pronta respuesta a los eventos de seguridad.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo muestra una configuración de Terraform que deshabilita el servicio de monitoreo de un clúster de GKE al establecer monitoring_service en none.

resource "google_container_cluster" "cluster-demo" {
name = "name-demo"
location = "us-central1-a"
monitoring_service = "none"
...
}
References
[1] HashiCorp google_container_cluster
[2] Google Cloud Configuring Cloud Operations for GKE
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark Recommendation 5.7.1
[4] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[5] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[6] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[7] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_insufficient_gke_cluster_monitoring
Abstract
La plantilla define un servicio con registros de auditoría insuficientes.
Explanation
La ausencia de registros de auditoría limita la capacidad de detectar y responder a incidentes relacionados con la seguridad e impide la investigación forense.

Los valores de configuración que socavan las capacidades de registro incluyen, entre otros:
- deshabilitar deliberadamente el registro de auditoría
- excluir acciones de usuarios, grupos o procesos específicos del registro
- proteger inadecuadamente la integridad del registro
- no habilitar el registro de auditoría opcional
- reducir la frecuencia de muestreo del registro
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[3] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000166, CCI-000172
[4] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[5] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-2 Account Management (P1), AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-2 Account Management, AU-10 Non-Repudiation, AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[7] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[11] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[12] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[17] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
La plantilla define un servicio con registros de auditoría insuficientes.
Explanation
La ausencia de registros de auditoría limita la capacidad de detectar y responder a incidentes relacionados con la seguridad e impide la investigación forense.

Los valores de configuración que socavan las capacidades de registro incluyen, entre otros:
- deshabilitar deliberadamente el registro de auditoría
- excluir acciones de usuarios, grupos o procesos específicos del registro
- proteger inadecuadamente la integridad del registro
- no habilitar el registro de auditoría opcional
- reducir la frecuencia de muestreo del registro
References
[1] Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) Logging Cheat Sheet
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark Recommendation 2.1
[3] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[4] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000166, CCI-000172
[5] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-2 Account Management (P1), AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-2 Account Management, AU-10 Non-Repudiation, AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[12] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000380 CAT III, APSC-DV-000390 CAT III, APSC-DV-000400 CAT III, APSC-DV-000410 CAT III, APSC-DV-000430 CAT III, APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.iac.misconfiguration_insufficient_logging.base
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform crea una subred de máquina virtual sin especificar opciones para el registro de flujo de nube privada virtual.
Explanation
La configuración de Terraform establece una subred de máquina virtual sin especificar opciones de registro. Estos registros contienen datos valiosos para el monitoreo de la red, análisis forense, análisis de seguridad en tiempo real y optimización de gastos.
References
[1] Google Cloud VPC Flow Logs overview
[2] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark Recommendation 3.8
[3] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 778
[4] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000172
[5] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[6] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Indirect Access to Sensitive Data
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-12 Audit Generation (P1)
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-12 Audit Record Generation
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 7.1.3 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.1.4 Log Content Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.1 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3), 7.2.2 Log Processing Requirements (L2 L3)
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration, A10 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A09 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.4, Requirement 10.3.4
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 10.2.1, Requirement 10.2.1.4, Requirement 10.2.2
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 8.2 - Activity Tracking
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000830 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_insufficient_vpc_flow_logging
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform asigna un rol de cuenta de servicio a un usuario de IAM.
Explanation
La mala gestión de los permisos aumenta el riesgo de acceso no autorizado o modificación de los datos y socava la disponibilidad del servicio.

Una cuenta de servicio es una cuenta especial de Google utilizada por una aplicación o una VM en lugar de una persona, que utiliza permisos confidenciales para ejecutar procesos automatizados o realizar solicitudes de API en nombre de los usuarios finales. Debe administrarse, controlarse y auditarse cuidadosamente para que se pueda confiar en él. Asignar un rol de cuenta de servicio a un usuario de IAM, que normalmente representa a una persona, debilita el control de seguridad.
References
[1] HashiCorp IAM policy for projects
[2] Google Cloud Service accounts
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark Recommendation 1.6
[4] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 285
[5] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000381, CCI-002233, CCI-002235
[6] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 AC
[7] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-6 Least Privilege (P1), CM-7 Least Functionality (P1)
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-6 Least Privilege, CM-7 Least Functionality
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 4.1.3 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3)
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A5 Broken Access Control
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 7.1.2
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 7.2.2
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 7.2.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.3 - Web Software Access Controls
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000500 CAT II, APSC-DV-000510 CAT I, APSC-DV-001500 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000500 CAT II, APSC-DV-000510 CAT I, APSC-DV-001500 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000500 CAT II, APSC-DV-000510 CAT I, APSC-DV-001500 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000500 CAT II, APSC-DV-000510 CAT I, APSC-DV-001500 CAT II
[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000500 CAT II, APSC-DV-000510 CAT I, APSC-DV-001500 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_overly_permissive_iam_role
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform define una regla de firewall de VPC que permite conexiones entrantes a un puerto sensible a la seguridad.
Explanation
Si no se bloquea el tráfico de red no deseado, se amplía la superficie de ataque de un servicio en la nube. Los servicios abiertos a la interacción con el público están sujetos a análisis y sondeos casi continuos por parte de entidades malintencionadas.
References
[1] HashiCorp google_compute_firewall
[2] Google Cloud VPC firewall rules overview
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark Recommendation 3.6
[4] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 749
[5] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000213, CCI-001084, CCI-002165
[6] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 AC
[7] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Access Violation
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-3 Access Enforcement (P1), AC-6 Least Privilege (P1), SC-3 Security Function Isolation (P1)
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-3 Access Enforcement, AC-6 Least Privilege, SC-3 Security Function Isolation
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 4.1.3 General Access Control Design (L1 L2 L3)
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A5 Broken Access Control
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A01 Broken Access Control
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.8
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 1.4.2
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 1.4.2
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 5.4 - Authentication and Access Control, Control Objective C.2.3 - Web Software Access Controls
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000460 CAT I, APSC-DV-000470 CAT II, APSC-DV-002360 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_overly_permissive_vpc_firewall
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform no especifica ninguna clave de cifrado administrada por el cliente para los datos en reposo.
Explanation
Las claves de cifrado administradas por el cliente (CMEK) no están habilitadas para los datos en reposo.

Por defecto, Google Cloud usa claves de cifrado de datos (DEK) generadas aleatoriamente para cifrar los datos en reposo. La función CMEK permite a las organizaciones utilizar claves criptográficas de su elección para cifrar las DEK. Esto brinda a las organizaciones un mejor control y registro de los procesos de cifrado.

Como tal, la CMEK suele ser parte de la solución para satisfacer requisitos que incluyen, entre otros:
- Registros de auditoría para el acceso a datos confidenciales
- Residencia de datos
- Reemplazo, deshabilitación o destrucción de claves
- Módulo de seguridad de hardware resistente a manipulaciones
References
[1] Google Cloud Customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK)
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[3] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001350, CCI-002475
[4] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[5] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-9 Protection of Audit Information (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-9 Protection of Audit Information, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[12] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 3.3.2, Requirement 3.3.3, Requirement 3.5.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.2 - Use of Cryptography
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.iac.gcp_bad_practices_missing_customer_managed_encryption_key.base
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform no especifica ninguna clave de cifrado administrada por el cliente para los datos en reposo.
Explanation
Las claves de cifrado administradas por el cliente (CMEK) no están habilitadas para los datos en reposo.

Por defecto, Google Cloud usa claves de cifrado de datos (DEK) generadas aleatoriamente para cifrar los datos en reposo. La función CMEK permite a las organizaciones utilizar claves criptográficas de su elección para cifrar las DEK. Esto brinda a las organizaciones un mejor control y registro de los procesos de cifrado.

Como tal, la CMEK suele ser parte de la solución para satisfacer requisitos que incluyen, entre otros:
- Registros de auditoría para el acceso a datos confidenciales
- Residencia de datos
- Reemplazo, deshabilitación o destrucción de claves
- Módulo de seguridad de hardware resistente a manipulaciones
References
[1] Google Cloud Customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK)
[2] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[3] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-001350, CCI-002475
[4] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 MP
[5] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-9 Protection of Audit Information (P1), SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-9 Protection of Audit Information, SC-28 Protection of Information at Rest
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 2.6.3 Look-up Secret Verifier Requirements (L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 8.1.6 General Data Protection (L3)
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[12] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 6.5.3
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 6.2.4, Requirement 3.5.1
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 3.3.2, Requirement 3.3.3, Requirement 3.5.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.2 - Use of Cryptography
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-001350 CAT II, APSC-DV-002340 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.iac.gcp_bad_practices_missing_customer_managed_encryption_key.base
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform no redirige el tráfico del mapa de URL de HTTP a HTTPS.
Explanation
Un mapa de URL es un conjunto de reglas para enrutar las solicitudes HTTP(S) entrantes a servicios de back-end específicos. Por defecto, un mapa de URL acepta conexiones no cifradas y no seguras. Esto expone los datos a accesos no autorizados, posibles robos y manipulaciones.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo muestra una configuración de Terraform que define un mapa de URL que permite a los clientes usar HTTP para la comunicación configurando https_redirect en false.

resource "google_compute_url_map" "urlmap" {
...
default_url_redirect {
...
https_redirect = false
...
}
...
}
References
[1] HashiCorp compute_url_map
[2] HashiCorp compute_region_url_map
[3] Google Cloud Use URL maps
[4] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 311
[5] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000068, CCI-001453, CCI-002418, CCI-002420, CCI-002421, CCI-002422, CCI-002890, CCI-003123
[6] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SC
[7] Standards Mapping - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Insufficient Data Protection
[8] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AC-17 Remote Access (P1), MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance (P2), SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity (P1)
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AC-17 Remote Access, MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance, SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 3.7.1 Defenses Against Session Management Exploits (L1 L2 L3), 6.2.1 Algorithms (L1 L2 L3), 9.1.1 Communications Security Requirements (L1 L2 L3), 9.2.1 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3), 9.2.3 Server Communications Security Requirements (L2 L3)
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A3 Sensitive Data Exposure
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A02 Cryptographic Failures
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 4.1, Requirement 6.5.4
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 4.2.1, Requirement 6.2.4
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography
[18] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design
[19] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 3.3 - Sensitive Data Retention, Control Objective 6.2 - Sensitive Data Protection, Control Objective 7 - Use of Cryptography, Control Objective B.2.5 - Terminal Software Design, Control Objective C.4.1 - Web Software Communications
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[23] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
[24] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000160 CAT II, APSC-DV-000170 CAT II, APSC-DV-001940 CAT II, APSC-DV-001950 CAT II, APSC-DV-002440 CAT I, APSC-DV-002450 CAT II, APSC-DV-002460 CAT II, APSC-DV-002470 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_url_map_missing_http_to_https_redirect
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform habilita la seguridad del sistema de nombres de dominio (DNSSEC) de un dominio DNS en la nube, con un algoritmo de firma inseguro.
Explanation
DNSSEC evita la falsificación de DNS al proporcionar la capacidad de usar firmas digitales para la validación de respuestas de DNS. Sin embargo, cualquier algoritmo de firma DNSSEC que use SHA-1 es susceptible de un riesgo de ataque cada vez mayor. SHA-1 ya no se considera un algoritmo hash seguro cuando se usa con firmas digitales.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo muestra una configuración de Terraform que habilita DNSSEC con el algoritmo de firma inseguro rsasha1.

resource "google_dns_managed_zone" "zone-demo" {
...
dnssec_config {
default_key_specs {
algorithm = "rsasha1"
...
}
}
...
}
References
[1] HashiCorp dns_managed_zone
[2] Google Cloud Use advanced DNSSEC
[3] Tony Finch SHA-1 chosen prefix collisions and DNSSEC
[4] IETF RFC 8624 Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for DNSSEC
[5] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Cloud Computing Platform Benchmark Recommendation 3.4, Recommendation 3.5
[6] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 327
[7] Standards Mapping - DISA Control Correlation Identifier Version 2 CCI-000166, CCI-002418, CCI-002422, CCI-002450
[8] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 SC
[9] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 AU-10 Non-Repudiation (P2), SC-12 Cryptographic Key Establishment and Management (P1), SC-13 Cryptographic Protection (P1)
[10] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 AU-10 Non-Repudiation, SC-12 Cryptographic Key Establishment and Management, SC-13 Cryptographic Protection
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[12] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 6.2.2 Algorithms (L2 L3)
[13] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration
[14] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A05 Security Misconfiguration
[15] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.0 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[16] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.1 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[17] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Software Security Framework 1.2 Control Objective 7.1 - Use of Cryptography
[18] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 4.11 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II
[19] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.1 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II
[20] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.2 APSC-DV-002010 CAT II
[21] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 5.3 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II
[22] Standards Mapping - Security Technical Implementation Guide Version 6.1 APSC-DV-000590 CAT II, APSC-DV-002010 CAT II
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_weak_cryptographic_cloud_dns_signature
Abstract
Una configuración de Terraform no establece el modo de red del clúster en VPC nativo.
Explanation
GKE admite dos modos de red de clúster: basado en rutas y nativo de VPC. Los clústeres nativos de VPC usan rangos de direcciones IP de alias para enrutar el tráfico de un pod en un nodo a otro pod. Esto permite políticas precisas basadas en IP y reglas de firewall para pods. Por el contrario, un nodo completo es el nivel de control de granularidad más fino en clústeres basados en rutas.

Ejemplo 1: El siguiente ejemplo de configuración de Terraform no habilita un clúster nativo de VPC configurando networking_mode en ROUTES.

resource "google_container_cluster" "cluster_demo" {
...
networking_mode = "ROUTES"
..
}
References
[1] HashiCorp google_container_cluster
[2] Google Cloud Creating a VPC-native cluster
[3] Standards Mapping - CIS Google Kubernetes Engine Benchmark Recommendation 5.6.2
[4] Standards Mapping - Common Weakness Enumeration CWE ID 923
[5] Standards Mapping - FIPS200 CM
[6] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 CM-6 Configuration Settings (P1), SC-7 Boundary Protection (P1)
[7] Standards Mapping - NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 CM-6 Configuration Settings, SC-7 Boundary Protection
[8] Standards Mapping - OWASP API 2023 API8 Security Misconfiguration
[9] Standards Mapping - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard 4.0 1.14.1 Configuration Architectural Requirements (L2 L3)
[10] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2017 A6 Security Misconfiguration
[11] Standards Mapping - OWASP Top 10 2021 A05 Security Misconfiguration
[12] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 3.2.1 Requirement 1.2.1
[13] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0 Requirement 1.4.2
[14] Standards Mapping - Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Version 4.0.1 Requirement 1.4.2
desc.structural.hcl.gcp_terraform_misconfiguration_weak_gke_cluster_network_management